Administrative Law Judges-Giving Process Its Due

By Glazer, Steven A. | The Public Manager, Fall 2008 | Go to article overview

Administrative Law Judges-Giving Process Its Due

Glazer, Steven A., The Public Manager

When federal agencies like the Social Security Administration (SSA), National Labor Relations Board, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and others decide cases in their areas of expertise, the public wants to know that the decisions are fair and impartial. No one wants to challenge a denial of a Medicare or Social Security claim or bring an unfair labor practice or other type of case to an administrative agency for a decision if the decision maker is biased or a tool of some political agenda. To ensure that this does not happen, the law has provided for the last half-century that many of these agency decisions are to be made by independent, impartial government employees known as administrative law judges (ALJs).

ALJs are adjudicators who support their agencies by holding hearings, gathering and ruling on evidence, hearing and evaluating witnesses, issuing subpoenas, regulating the course of the legal proceedings, and preparing an initial or recommended decision for final agency action in an individual case. To ensure their impartiality in decision making, ALJs are statutorily assured of decisional independence within their agencies. Their pay is set by statute, their performance is not reviewed by agency management, they are not easily removed from office, and they are selected by a process that is set apart from the usual hiring channels of the federal bureaucracy. This hiring process is designed to favor legal generalists over agency insiders in the choice of new ALJs for agency adjudicative positions and offers military veterans a preference over nonveterans.


Today, about 1,400 ALJs serve in some thirty agencies of the federal government. Approximately 86 percent of them serve in SSA branch offices all over the country, deciding disability benefits cases. A growing number also serve in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), deciding Medicare claims from four offices in Ohio, Florida, California, and Virginia.

At SSA, 1,100 ALJs heard more than 500,000 disability cases in 2006. In the same year, at the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals, 52 ALJs each processed an average of 1,800 claims. The 48 ALJs of the National Labor Relations Board issued 239 decisions and conducted 225 hearings. At the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), where I once worked, a small cadre of 4 ALJs considered a record-breaking 70 active "unfair import" cases in 2006. Although that number seems small compared with the caseloads of ALJs at other agencies, most ITC unfair import cases involve complex patented technology worth millions of dollars and are fought in long administrative hearings by numerous hotly competitive, litigious corporate opponents from the United States and foreign countries.

Agency caseloads vary with trends in government priorities. While the dockets of entitlements agencies like Social Security and Medicare now grow exponentially and require ever more ALJs and support staff members, those of economic regulatory agencies have dropped off, leading to attrition in the ranks of their ALJs. Several federal agencies, such as the Department of Education, Food and Drug Administration, and Federal Maritime Commission, make do today with only one ALJ apiece. Most other agencies in the economic regulatory sphere employ two to fifteen ALJs to process their administrative caseloads.

Although federal ALJs were established by the Administrative Procedure Act in 1947 for the purpose of reforming the way in which cases were heard and decided by what were then called "hearing examiners," ALJs have not provided the sole means by which the government decides administrative cases. There are thousands of other types of agency adjudicators, including "immigration judges" at the Department of Justice;" hearing officers" at the Department of Agriculture's National Appeals Division; "administrative judges" on various agency Boards of Contract Appeals, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; "administrative patent judges" and "administrative trademark judges" at the US. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Administrative Law Judges-Giving Process Its Due


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.