Exploring the Psychological Predictors of Programming Achievement

By Erdogan, Yavuz; Aydin, Emin et al. | Journal of Instructional Psychology, September 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Exploring the Psychological Predictors of Programming Achievement


Erdogan, Yavuz, Aydin, Emin, Kabaca, Tolga, Journal of Instructional Psychology


The main purpose of this study is to explore the predictors of programming achievement. With this aim in mind, the students' success in the programming courses is specified as the dependent variable and creativity, problem solving, general aptitudes, computer attitudes and mathematics achievement are specified as the independent variables. A correlational design was used to explain the relations between dependent and independent variables. The study group consists of 48 high school students in Profilo Anatolia Technical High School, Istanbul. At the end of the study, significant relations were found between the students' programming achievement and their general aptitudes and mathematics achievement. Also, in order to determine the predictors of the students' programming achievement, multiple regression analysis was applied. The findings reveal that only one variable that significantly predicts the students' programming achievement is general aptitude.

**********

There have been many studies in recent years into academic success in computer programming (McNamarah & Pyne, 2004; Byrne & Lyons, 2001; Begum, 2003; Fowler and et al., 2002). Today, industry is keen to accept as many graduates as the academic institutions can produce, and there is an assumption that any bright student can be successful in computer programming. However, experience in the classroom would suggest that this is not true. Students who are proficient in many other subjects sometimes fail to achieve success in programming (Byrne & Lyons, 2001), because programming is different from other discipline.

The developments of programming languages and methods, and the teaching of them, have up to now hardly been linked to a psychological study of the activity of programming. Psychology must go beyond the procedural aspect of programming; because it is becoming more and more important nowadays due to the variety of applications and the training that programmers receive (Hoc and et al., 1990). Prior research indicates that standardized measures of aptitude (e.g. SAT and ACT scores), prior academic performance (e.g. high school GPA) and effort or motivation explain a significant portion of the variation in student performance (Eskew & Faley, 1981; Hostetler, 1983; Goold & Rimmer, 2000).

In a review of studies attempting to predict programming achievement done up to 1990, Hostetler and Corman make a specific case for the inclusion of cognitive factors in any study of this kind (Hostetler, 1983; Corman, 1986). They found that some of the demographic, academic, computer exposure or cognitive variables were particularly strong predictors of class performance. According to Taylor and Mounfield (1989) prior experience in programming provides a significant predictor of how students perform in the programming courses. They founded that prior exposure whether at the high school or college level is an important factor to students' success in computer programming.

Also, the link between mathematics ability and programming is widely accepted. Several of the reviewed studies showed that success in Mathematics was a good predictor of success in computer science (Byrne & Lyons, 2001; Fowler and et al., 2002; Werth, 1986; Campbell, 1984; Chmura, 1998). There is a belief that the concepts which a student has to comprehend in order to master mathematics problems are similar to those for programming (Byrne & Lyons, 2001; Werth, 1986).

Besides those there appears to be a number of factors which influence the success in the programming. In general the reviewed research found correlation between computer attitudes and computer programming (Dey & Mand, 1986; Austin, 1987). Also, earlier studies indicated that demographic data impacted on programming success (Byrne & Lyons, 2001; Goold & Rimmer, 2000; Grant, 2003). Five factors were reviewed as potentially predictive to success in programming.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Exploring the Psychological Predictors of Programming Achievement
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?