Double-Edged Foreign Policy: Business Leaders Say Economic Sanctions on Repressive Regimes Can Backfire on U.S. Interests

By Koprowski, Gene | Insight on the News, November 25, 1996 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Double-Edged Foreign Policy: Business Leaders Say Economic Sanctions on Repressive Regimes Can Backfire on U.S. Interests


Koprowski, Gene, Insight on the News


Business leaders say economic sanctions on repressive regimes can backfire on U.S. interests.

Last May Sen. Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, made some moving remarks before the Senate Banking Committee deploring the dismal situation in Burma, where democratic activist Aung San Suu Kyi and her followers have been battling a repressive military regime for years.

"Rape, detentions, killings, forced labor and relocations are just a few of the tools the military regime routinely uses to secure their power," said McConnell. The military regime "is convinced it will pay no price for recalcitrance and repression. Just as they have increased pressure on the democracy movement, we must increase pressure on them. This is the time to move forward and impose sanctions on Burma."

The senator is no stranger to sanctions - 10 years ago, he and Sens. William Roth, Republican from Delaware, and Chris Dodd, Democrat from Connecticut, pushed for the economic measures against South Africa. Other major trading partners of the United States, including France, Britain and Germany, participated in the sanctions, which widely are credited with having brought down apartheid.

But since that time, McConnell and his congressional colleagues have strayed from their initial strategy. Unilateral sanctions increasingly have become the fashionable tool among the political elite to retaliate against repressive regimes which run afoul of U.S. foreign policy, including Libya, Serbia, Cuba, Nigeria, North Korea, Rwanda and now Burma. And increasingly, that policy proclivity is unsettling many in the U.S. business community.

Sanctions score plenty of political points domestically and are easy to support on the cocktail-party circuit in Manhattan and Georgetown. But Caterpillar Inc., Allied Signal and other Fortune 500 companies see multimillion-dollar contracts - and thousands of jobs - lost to foreign competitors whose governments aren't participating in the sanctions. And now these U.S.-based multinationals formally are initiating an effort to convince Congress, the White House and opinion makers that sanctions should be used only as a last resort.

"Greater restraint should be exercised by our policymakers, meaning the Congress and the executive branch, in reaching for the instrument of unilateral sanctions to respond to a foreign-policy problem," says Daniel O'Flaherty, vice president of the National Foreign Trade Council, a group of 500 U.S. multinational companies. "There has been, for the last couple of years, a fairly dramatic increase in the number of sanctions that have been proposed and the number that have been imposed. There is a growing alarm and concern among CEOs of major companies that market after market either is being denied them, or their operations are being complicated by these efforts. And even if these efforts are unsuccessful, there is an effect on business relationships."

Adds Caterpillar Chairman Donald Fites in an opinion piece he is preparing on the subject: "The real pressure is on the U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Double-Edged Foreign Policy: Business Leaders Say Economic Sanctions on Repressive Regimes Can Backfire on U.S. Interests
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?