Medicaid and SCHIP Coverage: Findings from California and North Carolina

By Kenney, Genevieve; Rubenstein, Jamie et al. | Health Care Financing Review, Fall 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Medicaid and SCHIP Coverage: Findings from California and North Carolina

Kenney, Genevieve, Rubenstein, Jamie, Sommers, Anna, Zuckerman, Stephen, Blavin, Fredric, Health Care Financing Review


A number of recent studies have examined access and use experiences of children enrolled in SCHIP. These studies consistently show that SCHIP enrollment improves access to and receipt of care for children who enroll in SCHIP. Other studies have examined the extent to which SCHIP is substituting for ESI (Allison et al., 2003; Hughes, Angeles, and Stilling, 2002; Sommers et al., 2007), finding that a small percentage of children transfer directly from private coverage to SCHIP.

In contrast, less research has been conducted recently on Medicaid Programs for children. It is important to examine access issues under Medicaid, which covers 25 million children (Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, 2006). Medicaid is also the most important source of coverage to poor children in this country, insuring close to 60 percent living below the Federal poverty level (FPL).

There have been ongoing concerns about access to care under Medicaid related to low payment to providers and other factors. However, past studies have found that Medicaid enrollees fare better than their uninsured counterparts and that they enjoy better access than low-income children with private coverage in some service areas because of the broader benefits and narrower cost-sharing requirements in Medicaid.

Historically, substitution of public for private coverage has been far less of a concern within the Medicaid Program than within SCHIP. While SCHIP legislation mandates that States implement policies to discourage substitution at enrollment, no such mandate exists for Medicaid. For example, children eligible for Medicaid and covered by employer insurance are not required to fulfill waiting periods before enrollment. (1) Previous research has found some evidence of substitution for private coverage by the Medicaid Program--referred to as crowd-out (Blumberg, Dubay, and Norton, 2000; Cutler and Gruber, 1997; Dubay and Kenney, 1996).

Here we examine parental coverage patterns and access to care for children enrolled in Medicaid and SCHIP, and we assess impacts of Medicaid enrollment for children in California and North Carolina. (2) This analysis was done as part of a congressionally mandated evaluation of SCHIP that examined 10 States that included supplemental analysis of Medicaid Programs for children in 2 States. California and North Carolina were selected for the supplemental Medicaid study because they each have a major separate SCHIP component, which provides a contrast between the programs, and because they both had enrollment files that could support the study. (3,4)

Table 1 shows how SCHIP differs from Medicaid along several programmatic dimensions in these two States. As mentioned previously, both States have separate non-Medicaid SCHIPs under Title XXI: Healthy Families (California) and Healthy Choice (North Carolina). In both States, children's enrollment in Medicaid far exceeds enrollment in SCHIP. (5)

Medicaid has more generous income eligibility thresholds for infants and children under age 6 than for school-age children. For example, Medicaid income eligibility thresholds for infants are 200 percent of the FPL in California, and 185 percent in North Carolina, 133 percent for age 1-5, and 100 percent for age 6-18 (under Medicaid, States must cover children under 6 up to 133 percent of the FPL and children 6-18 up to 100 percent of the FPL). In contrast, SCHIP income eligibility thresholds are 250 and 200 percent for children of all ages in California and North Carolina, respectively. In both States, Medicaid and SCHIP service delivery systems are different from one another--in North Carolina, SCHIP relies on a Blue Cross[R]/Blue Shield[R] network which includes different providers than under Medicaid, and in California, Medicaid and SCHIP contract with different managed care plans (Hawkes and Howell, 2002; Hill and Hawkes, 2002; Hill, Harrington, and Hawkes, 2004).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Medicaid and SCHIP Coverage: Findings from California and North Carolina


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?