Biographical Mania: The Transformation of Biographical Theory in Nineteenth-Century America

By Casper, Scott E. | Nineteenth-Century Prose, Fall 1995 | Go to article overview

Biographical Mania: The Transformation of Biographical Theory in Nineteenth-Century America


Casper, Scott E., Nineteenth-Century Prose


In our own clay, when there are more "Lives" written in proportion to the bulk of literature chart ever before, there is less deference to rule, and apparently less sense of responsibility, in their preparation than ever before.

--North American Review, April 1857

In 1830, the New-York Mirror celebrated Americans' "Biographical Mania." "'The march of intellect,' so called, has rendered nearly every man of only limited acquirements a thinker and an observer." As a result, "public characters are scanned with a minuteness and a scrutiny unknown to our progenitors." The desire for "denuding public men of all the pomp and mystery of office and situation" and requiring them to appear in their "private character, to stand the scrutiny of their fellow men" was, to the Mirror, especially justifiable "in a republican government, where the ruling men of the times should be known as they really are." Twenty-seven years later, the Boston Evening Gazette--in an article under the same tide--similarly observed the increasing "partiality on the part of the reading community for biographies" and the rising "desire to learn more and more of the private lives of those whose writings have commanded our attention, whose eloquence has excited our wonder, or whose public acts have won our praise." (1) But in the Gazette's opinion, "The Biographical Mania" of 1857 was a literary disorder, not a welcome symptom of democracy. Biographers were now "a species of harpies," who either worshipped their subjects or dredged up scandals and private immoralities that tarnished the reputations of the great. Biography was, it seemed, being written in the worst ways imaginable.

The Evening Gazette was not alone in finding contemporary biography deficient. As the number of American biographies multiplied after 1830, so did the voices raised against them. (2) The New York Review complained in 1842 that most biographies were "little more than dull exaggerations--fact inflated into falsehood--admiration magnified by stupidity--a tissue of conjectures--misstatements and misapprehensions, bound together in a confused mass by the narrow withe of ignorance and incapacity." (3) The North American Review wrote fifteen years later of "biographical assassins swarming in all directions." (4) And the Atlantic Monthly lamented in 1864 that the dangers of biography would discourage men from seeking distinction, for "The moment an audacious head is lifted one inch above the general level, pop! goes the unerring rifle of some biographical sharp-shooter." Biographers were compared to vultures and worms awaiting corpses, and to "some cannibal entomologist" waiting to "transfix" his specimens. (5)

As these responses to America's ever-increasing "biographical mania" suggest, critics of biography leveled a two-pronged attack from the 1830s on. On the one hand, biographers too often eulogized their subjects, glossing over faults and obscuring the "real nature of the individual." On the other, biographers increasingly delved too deeply into their subjects' private lives, exposing to public view what ought to remain private. Perhaps paradoxically, both complaints about biography, that it told too little and that it told too much, agreed that biography as it was usually written failed to give its reader the "inner man," the subject as he "truly" was. The presentation or revelation of this "inner man" was at the heart of the "rules" for biography that critics expounded beginning in the 1840s. Influenced by the Romantic concept of the "great man," critics recast both the purpose and the method of biography. Biography as text, considered in the early republic an agent of moral instruction above all, began to be discussed as a literary product that revealed and portrayed a unique individual. Biography as writing process assumed a new importance in critics' eyes: the biographer could no longer simply present implausible anecdotes and glorious public deeds in order to inspire emulation; he needed the scientist's skills of research and verification and the artist's talents of organization and narration.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Biographical Mania: The Transformation of Biographical Theory in Nineteenth-Century America
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.