Why I Won't Vote for Obama: We Should Be Joyful That, for the First Time in US History, an African-Descended Person Has Mounted a Serious Challenge for the American Presidency. but Ama Biney Would Not Vote for Obama. Here, She Explains Why

New African, November 2008 | Go to article overview

Why I Won't Vote for Obama: We Should Be Joyful That, for the First Time in US History, an African-Descended Person Has Mounted a Serious Challenge for the American Presidency. but Ama Biney Would Not Vote for Obama. Here, She Explains Why


The majority of continental Africans and people of African descent have been euphoric at the meteoric rise of Barack Obama. For the second time in history -after the lesser known candidacy of the African-American Congresswoman Shirley Chisholm in 1972-a black person has become a credible candidate for the presidency of the most powerful country in the world. Obamania has surged in Ghana, Jamaica, Trinidad, Cameroon, Kenya and elsewhere. It has produced a number of musical tributes, articles, blogs and important sentiments such as those expressed by the Congolese rapper, Youssoupha, who lives in Paris: "Obama tells us everything is possible."

Certainly one of the positive impacts of the Obama campaign is that in France it has given Africans there-once referred to by President Nicholas Sarkhozy as "scum"-a new political confidence to revisit Negritude. Raising a frank dialogue about race and racism in wider French society in which African people are invisible, is also a positive outcome of Obama's political success.

Similarly, in many Latin American countries where there is a significant African population and people of mixed ancestry, Obama's campaign is giving them the impetus to fight their invisibility in societies that deny any connection with African identity other than exoticised African dances.

What is at the heart of the Obama appeal? Undoubtedly, his bi-racial ancestry appeals across the "colour line"'; his ability to communicate the need for change and a universal health system for low income Americans; his suave hand some image in a society obsessed with looks; his political articulation and freshness. For many adulatory African-Americans, continental Africans and people of African descent, Obama's political rise is an illustration that anyone can make it. Whilst the right to vote in America, Britain, South Africa and elsewhere was a long bitter struggle by people of colour and the working classes who were politically and economically disenfranchised, there comes a time when voting becomes a useless exercise that effects little or no change-particularly when the choice becomes one of which two political parties can manage the liberal capitalist system more efficiently in favour of the rich in order to permanently exclude the poor?

Or to put it in the way Malcolm X would have: there is no real difference between the Democratic "fox" and the Republican "wolf". One is prepared to frighten the people so badly that they will wholeheartedly embrace the sly fox to escape the fangs of the wolf. In short, this does not avoid the fact that one will be eaten. If 1 was an American citizen (I am not! I am a British citizen of Ghanaian nationality!) I would have profound reservations in voting for Obama because his political stance on a number of issues reveals his ideological vision of America which remains one that continues America's grand imperialistic role and the place of the Democratic Party in serving that role. Many of us are too intoxicated with, if not blinded by, the euphoric idea of having a black American President to see this.

Some may consider that Obama's policies on Africa will be more favourable to the continent in terms of trade. Also, under an Obama presidency, there may be more generous assistance in the vein of the Bush administration via the Millennium Challenge Account.

However, it is clear that Africa has increased in strategic importance to America since 9/11. Especially significant is the African Command, or Africom, set up by George Bush in 2007. Its aims are to secure further energy supplies in Africa i.e. oil for America and to continue the global war on terror.

Obama is known to be favourable to Africom. Yet, fundamentally, Africom will spell the increasing and dangerous militarisation of the African continent in the service of America's wider national security interests as outlined in the disturbing 2002 document entitled The National Security Strategy of the United States. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Why I Won't Vote for Obama: We Should Be Joyful That, for the First Time in US History, an African-Descended Person Has Mounted a Serious Challenge for the American Presidency. but Ama Biney Would Not Vote for Obama. Here, She Explains Why
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.