Patent Infringement and Royalty Rates: Is Litigation a 'Deterrent'?

By Adams, A. Frank,, III; Naydenova, Budina et al. | Atlantic Economic Journal, December 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Patent Infringement and Royalty Rates: Is Litigation a 'Deterrent'?


Adams, A. Frank,, III, Naydenova, Budina, Calcagno, Peter T., Atlantic Economic Journal


JEL K41

Patent infringement cases require that a damages expert put forth a reasonable royalty calculation to assist the trier of fact in determining damages absent the ability of the patent holder to make the sales that the infringer made. Numerous factors affect the calculation of a reasonable royalty including the industry in which the patent holder operates, the market size for the product, the growth potential of the product, and so forth. Industry-wide averages can be a useful starting point in calculating a reasonable royalty as royalty rates in various industries exhibit distinctly different central tendencies. In this paper, we compare the results of recent Federal Appeals Court decisions involving royalty rate awards with royalty rate data from arm's-length non-litigation sources to see if litigation results in higher royalty rates.

The venue for patent infringement cases typically resides in federal court because patents are governed by federal statutes. Moreover, in 1982, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit was created specifically to hear intellectual property infringement appeals. Over the years, the courts have provided guidance for determining damages in patent infringement litigation with the two most often cited examples being the Georgia-Pacific [Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. U.S. Plywood Corp. 318 F. Supp. 1166, 1121 (S.D.N.Y. 1970), modified, 446 F. 2d 295 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 404 U. S. 870, 92 S.Ct. 105, 30L.Ed. 2d 114 (1971)] and Panduit [Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Brothers Fibre Works, Inc., 575 F.2d 1152 (6th Cir. 1978)] decisions.

Each of these cases provides a starting point for expert witnesses in calculating patent infringement damages. The Georgia-Pacific Court identified 14 factors to be considered in calculating damages while the Panduit Court provided yet more guidance in this area. Regarding royalty calculations, the Panduit Court was very clear regarding the 'reasonableness' of those calculations as illustrated in the following excerpt: "The setting of a reasonable royalty after infringement cannot be treated, as it was here, as the equivalent of ordinary royalty negotiations among truly "willing" patent owners and licensees. That view would constitute a pretense that the infringement never happened. It would also make an election to infifnge a handy means for competitors to impose a "compulsory license" policy upon every patent owner." (1158) The Panduit Court makes it clear that the award of a reasonable royalty, one determined as a result of a hypothetical negotiation between a 'willing licensor/willing licensee,' would be insufficient to serve as a deterrent for future infringers.

The data for our analysis were obtained from U.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Patent Infringement and Royalty Rates: Is Litigation a 'Deterrent'?
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?