20% of Agri Tariff Lines Pushed as Special Products

Manila Bulletin, July 23, 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

20% of Agri Tariff Lines Pushed as Special Products


This was pressed by the Rice Watch and Action Network (R1), National Rice Farmers Council (NRFC) and United Broiler Raisers' Association in a press statement as trade negotiators gathered in Geneva for a "make or break" talks to conclude negotiations in the World Trade Organization.

Under the SP scheme, developing countries are allowed to designate a number of their agricultural products as SPs. These can have lesser tariff cuts than the regular formula cuts stated in the Market Access provision of the WTO.

"We call on our trade ministers to assert our right to designate at least 20 percent of our agricultural tariff lines as SPs and not the current proposal of 10-18 percent only," said

Georgie San Diego, President of United Broilers.

San Diego said that the G33, to which the Philippines is a party, has given up much of its basic positions since the Hong Kong Ministerial Meeting in 2005 that is why their groups are calling on the G33 ministers to stay firm and united on the basic demands on SP and Special Safeguards Mechanism (SSM).

He added that developing countries should be exempted from tariff reduction but the current text allows only 6 percent of SPs, almost insignificant compared to the original proposal of the G33 which was 50 percent of SPs.

Imported chicken coming from the United States and Canada, not including smuggled chicken comprise nine percent of the Philippine market.

National Rice Farmers Council (NRFC) chairperson Jaime Tadeo said the latest draft modalities on agriculture present clear and present danger on the livelihood of the developing countries' poor and marginalized farm sector.

The Philippines is the world's top rice-importing country with its government set to import 2.1 million this year, the highest in recent years and with record high prices as well. Considered one of the impacts of high prices was the decision of exporting countries to restrict their exports to secure their own domestic supply.

"Developing countries that have nevertheless, liberalized food trade had no choice but to buy rice and other staple at very high costs. Indeed, unbridled importation of rice and other agriculture products is not the way to secure the food of the people in developing countries. Worse, it unfairly placed the local farmers at a disadvantage position with some developing countries giving up their vision to achieve food self-sufficiency," Tadeo explained.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

20% of Agri Tariff Lines Pushed as Special Products
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?