A Comparison of Two Control-Display Gain Measures for Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices

By Schaab, John A.; Radwin, Robert G. et al. | Human Factors, September 1996 | Go to article overview

A Comparison of Two Control-Display Gain Measures for Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices


Schaab, John A., Radwin, Robert G., Vanderheiden, Gregg C., Hansen, Per Krogh, Human Factors


INTRODUCTION

Head-controlled computer input devices, or headpointers, allow computer operators to maneuver a cursor in a graphical user interface using head movements instead of the hand movements that are usually needed for mice and trackballs. Head-controlled interfaces provide an alternative method of accessing a computer and have been beneficial for some individuals with impaired upper-extremity control caused by spinal cord injury, degenerative muscular conditions, or cerebral palsy. The focus of this study is to examine characteristics of head motor control in order to provide information that will enhance performance of head-controlled computer input devices.

The linear relationship between movement time and the index of difficulty (ID) as described by Fitts' law has proven to be a robust predictor of various components of the human motor system (Fitts, 1954; Fitts & Peterson, 1964). Langolf, Chaffin, and Foulke (1976) showed Fitts' law to be a good predictor of movement time for the finger, wrist, and arm. Fitts' law has also been shown to be a reliable predictor of movement time for computer-related tasks involving a variety of hand-operated input devices (Card, English, & Burr, 1978; Epps, 1986). Research on head-controlled computer interfaces and the human movement characteristics associated with them has received limited attention.

Jagacinski and Monk (1985) were among the first to report on a head-controlled computer interface. Their study used a helmet-mounted sight as a computer input device and found Fitts' law to adequately describe head movement. The results of their study indicated that movement time was slightly faster for head movements along the vertical and horizontal axes than for those along diagonal axes.

A discrete target acquisition task was developed by Radwin, Vanderheiden, and Lin (1990) to measure and evaluate the performance of various alternative computer input devices. The results of their study supported Jagacinski and Monk's findings that Fitts' law aptly described head movement in computer-related tasks and that performance for diagonal head movements was slower than for movements along the vertical or horizontal axis.

Andres and Hartung (1989) showed that head movement could be described using Fitts' law for a tapping task involving a chin stylus. Spitz (1990) used a prototype head-controlled computer input device to study users' ability to control cursor location by tilting their head. The results of that study also supported a Fitts' law relationship and showed tilting movements of the head to be less efficient than extension/flexion movements at longer movement amplitudes.

Selection of a control-display gain setting for a particular input device has been an important issue for designers of computer interfaces. Chapanis and Kinkade (1972) indicated the need to empirically determine optimum gain for an input device, given the complexities involved within each system. The optimization of control-display gain has been the focus of several studies (Arnaut & Greenstein, 1986; Gibbs, 1962; Jenkins & Connor, 1949; Lin, Radwin, & Vanderheiden, 1992).

Typically the difference between hand- and head-controlled interfaces is that hand-controlled interfaces involve linear hand movement while the head remains stationary, whereas head-controlled interfaces involve head movements relative to a stationary display. As a result, the description of the control-display gain relationship for a head-controlled input device is different from that of traditional movements involving the upper extremities. An exception to this was Gibbs' (1962) study of joystick interfaces, in which control-display gain was defined as the ratio of angular movement of the display's cursor subtended at the user's eyes to corresponding angular movement of the joystick. Similarly, Jagacinski and Monk (1985), and later Lin et al. (1992), defined control-display gain for head-controlled interfaces as the ratio of the angle subtended by the displacement of the cursor to the viewing position and the corresponding angle of head extension/flexion or rotation. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Comparison of Two Control-Display Gain Measures for Head-Controlled Computer Input Devices
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.