Media Watchdogs Sleep as Starr Ignores Perjury

By Irvine, Reed; Goulden, Joseph C. | Insight on the News, January 20, 1997 | Go to article overview

Media Watchdogs Sleep as Starr Ignores Perjury


Irvine, Reed, Goulden, Joseph C., Insight on the News


James Carville's public assault on Whitewater Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr has been viewed with disfavor by nearly everyone - except Bill Clinton. The president's refusal to comment supports the suspicion that he welcomes the attacks initiated by his 1992 campaign manager. Carville's claim that Starr is so partisan that he cannot be trusted to evaluate the evidence of possible wrongdoing on the part of the president and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton is a close relative of Clinton's charge that Starr is out to get him. Both are way off base.

A better case can be made that Starr has protected Clinton for the last two years, helping him win a second term. As Starr heads into his third winter as independent counsel, with the chilling blasts from Clinton and Carville at his back, his rejoinder to these critics ought to be: "Blow, blow thou winter wind/Thou art not so unkind as man's ingratitude."

Starr is more vulnerable to the criticism that he has proceeded with the Washington phase of his investigation with all the speed of a Greenland glacier. It was obvious to those who followed the Senate Whitewater hearings on C-span that many of the witnesses had perjured themselves. The majority report of the committee charged several senior administration officials with having provided inaccurate and incomplete testimony to the Senate." It also charged that White House official had impeded its investigation by "the withholding and delay in the production of documents directly relevant to the committee's investigation." Among those named were White House Counsel Bernard Nussbaum and Chief of Staff to the First Lady Maggie Williams, who were accused of having lied in their testimony about the removal of documents from Vincent Foster's office. It said that these and other witnesses had obstructed its efforts to investigate the handling of documents in Fosters office following his death, and it had voted to refer the matter, including the testimony of specific witnesses, to the Office of the Independent Counsel for possible criminal violations. That report was dated June 17, 1996.

Nearly six months have passed and the independent counsel has yet to indict anyone in Washington for perjury or obstruction of justice. This leaves the impression that there is no risk in lying under oath to Congress and that officials can withhold subpoenaed material with little fear of being punished. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Media Watchdogs Sleep as Starr Ignores Perjury
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.