Cross-Atlantic Influence

By Emery, Allan | Nineteenth-Century Prose, Winter 1988 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Cross-Atlantic Influence


Emery, Allan, Nineteenth-Century Prose


Robert Weisbuch, Atlantic Double-Cross: American Literature and British Influence in the Age of Emerson. Chicago UP, 1987. 360pp.

In Atlantic Double-Cross Robert Weisbuch applies the theories of Anglo-American literary relations of the mid-nineteenth century, contending that American writers of this period were "anxious" to prove their equality with (or even superiority to) contemporary British writers and attempted to do so in various ingenious ways. In an exceptionally interesting first chapter, Weisbuch employs a nervous quotation from Emerson (returned from recent visits to Coleridge, Wordsworth, and Carlyle) as the springboard for a comprehensive discussion of American writers' professional insecurities in relation to Britain. Citing numerous comments by American writers of the period, Weisbuch shows that these writers sensed a general American indebtedness to British models; that this indebtedness could not be acknowledged without embarrassment; that (for reasons of prior political and present linguistic connection) British literary achievements provoked far more jealousy in Americans than did the achievements of Continental writers; that American literature's relation to British literature was highly antagonistic; that American writers sought to compete mainly with nineteenth-century British writers (rather than older writers like Shakespeare); that individual quarrels with particular British writers exemplified a larger American quarrel with British literature, thus adding fuel to the American fire; and that the struggle of American writers with their British counterparts continued into the later nineteenth century, though reaching a peak during the American Renaissance.

Later chapters push this argument in significant new directions. In Chapter 3, "A Litany of Causes," Weisbuch views the American literary nationalism of the mid-nineteenth century as partly a symptom of anti-British feeling and underscores the triumph of that nationalism over the internationalism of writers like Lowell and Longfellow. In Chapter 5, "Cultural Time in England and America," he suggests that the American emphasis on the value of "cultural earliness" (an emphasis discoverable in Emerson, Thoreau, and others) resulted from the British contention that America could produce no great literature until it owned an extensive history. And in Chapter 7, "History in the Brain, Thought in the Land," he argues that American writers also responded to his contention in other ways: Hawthorne "stretched" time (exaggerating the oldness of his historical materials); Cooper mythologized American history (turning ordinary historical events into "archetypal" ones); Whitman and Dickinson abolished history, reveling in a radical "futurism;" and Emerson developed the idea of "vertical time," the notion that, in the enlarged self, every moment contained all history.

In Chapters 9 and 11 Weisbuch treats American "actualism" and "ontological insecurity," two other products of America's literary competition with Britain. He explains that British writers (particularly of the Victorian period) believed in the reality of the external world, the power of that world to influence human lives, and the moral importance of portraying that world in literature. In response to these beliefs, American writers developed the contrary theory that internal (mental) reality mattered most, that individuals could freely direct their lives, and that literature's function was to envision ideals that could be "actualized" in the world, replacing the "hard facts of land and industry." Weisbuch suggests that writers like Emerson, Thoreau, and Dickinson disdained all dealings with such facts and chose to spin worlds "out of the self." He also notes, however, that the American confidence in the ultimate importance of imagined reality led at times to a troubling "insecurity" about the substantialness of any reality. This insecurity, to be found most importantly in Hawthorne and Melville, was nevertheless valuable to such writers, for it led them, in works like The Scarlet Letter and Moby-Dick, to address the problem of subjectivity, to examine instances of interpretation, to view human perception as a worthwhile subject of literary study.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Cross-Atlantic Influence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?