Section 1983-Qualified Immunity - Ninth Circuit Holds That School's Strip Search of a Student Violated the Fourth Amendment under Clearly Established Law. - Redding V. Safford Unified School District No. 1

Harvard Law Review, December 2008 | Go to article overview

Section 1983-Qualified Immunity - Ninth Circuit Holds That School's Strip Search of a Student Violated the Fourth Amendment under Clearly Established Law. - Redding V. Safford Unified School District No. 1


Qualified immunity allows public officials to carry on their duties without the fear of liability or the burdens of litigation. (1) The Supreme Court's modern qualified immunity test asks whether a constitutional right was "clearly established" at the time of its violation by a public official such that no reasonable official could have believed his actions were lawful. (2) The Court has described this standard as giving "ample room for mistaken judgments" (3) by protecting "all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law." (4) Recently, in Redding v. Safford Unified School District No. 1, (5) the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, denied qualified immunity to a middle school assistant principal after finding that the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment by mandating an unreasonable strip search of a student. (6) A bare majority concluded the law was clearly established without weighing the fact that the district court, two judges on the Ninth Circuit panel, and three dissenting judges en banc thought the search was constitutional. (7) Ignoring judicial disagreement about constitutionality in the "clearly established" analysis effectively holds laypeople to a higher standard of predicting reasonableness than judges. This refusal to acknowledge dissent is thus inimical to the purposes of the doctrine, particularly in the school setting, where flexibility is highly valued. In Redding, appropriate consideration of disagreement would have led to a grant of qualified immunity--a grant in line with both the purposes of qualified immunity and other cases addressing disagreement about clearly established law.

The morning of October 8, 2003, Jordan, a student, approached Assistant Principal Wilson and alerted him that a group of students were planning to take pills during lunch. (8) Jordan produced a white pill, identified as a 400-milligram tablet of ibuprofen that is available only by prescription. (9) He stated that he had received the pill from Marissa, a fellow student. (10) Wilson brought Marissa into his office and searched her belongings. (11) The search revealed additional pills and a planner, borrowed from a student named Savana Redding, and containing knives, a cigarette, and a lighter. (12) Upon questioning, Marissa stated she had received the pills from Savana. (13) Savana was called to the principal's office, and when she arrived she saw her planner, the other items, and the pills on the principal's desk. (14) Savana explained that the items were not hers and she had never brought pills to school. (15) After futilely searching Savana's belongings for prescription drugs, Wilson instructed his secretary and the school nurse, both females, to conduct a more thorough search. (16) In the nurse's office, Savana was asked to remove her shirt and pants. (17) She was then asked to pull her bra out to the side and shake it, and to do the same with her underwear. (18) After the search failed to reveal pills, Savana dressed and returned to the office. (19)

Savana's mother filed a [section] 1983 (20) claim in the District of Arizona against the school, Wilson, his secretary, and the nurse. (21) Under Saucier v. Katz, (22) holding a state officer civilly responsible for constitutional violations requires a two-step inquiry. (23) First, the court must decide if there was a violation of a right on the facts alleged. (24) Second, the court must determine if the right was clearly established. (25) The Reddings argued that the strip search violated Savana's Fourth Amendment privacy rights against unreasonable searches and that such a right was clearly established. (26) The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing the search was reasonable, particularly in light of the school's history of drug-related problems. (27) The district court applied the two-prong constitutionality test required by New Jersey v. T.L.O., (28) finding the search both justified at its inception and reasonable in scope. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Section 1983-Qualified Immunity - Ninth Circuit Holds That School's Strip Search of a Student Violated the Fourth Amendment under Clearly Established Law. - Redding V. Safford Unified School District No. 1
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.