Humanism as a 'Quasi-religion.'(Defining Humanism: The Battle Continues)

By Smith, John E. | Free Inquiry, Fall 1996 | Go to article overview

Humanism as a 'Quasi-religion.'(Defining Humanism: The Battle Continues)

Smith, John E., Free Inquiry

It is essential at the outset to pose and try to resolve a problem which has led to considerable fruitless discussion in the past, namely, whether such movements as Humanism, Marxism, and Nationalism are to be regarded as forms of "religion." Corliss Lamont, for example, in his learned and well thought out description of a Humanism that has gained wide acceptance, develops naturalistic Humanism as a philosophy and he clearly does not want to have it taken as a religion; for him, religion is inextricably tied to a belief in the supernatural which his Humanism excludes. In fact, he criticizes those religious Humanists, largely Unitarian ministers, who signed the Humanist Manifesto of 1933 written by Roy Wood Sellars which opposed supernaturalism; Lamont writes, "I feel that they need to justify more adequately than they have yet done their retention of the ancient and hallowed word religion." Further testimony in the same direction is to be found in the theme of a conference sponsored by FREE INQUIRY, "Living Without Religion; The Ethics of Humanism." It seems clear that these Humanists are strongly opposed to any identification of their position as a religion.

"Quasi-religion" is not a term of opprobrium nor does it imply any sort of negative judgment about these movements; it is meant to be as close to the purely descriptive as one may hope to get. I reject the expression that has sometimes been used in this connection - "pseudo-religion" - because I believe it is both unfair and misleading. It suggests something counterfeit and implies that there is nothing of value in these substitute visions of human life. There are at least two closely related reasons for speaking of quasi-religions as movements having similarities in structure and function with the recognized religions; first, is the fact that many quasi-religions have been born out of the failures of the established religions to adjust to change and to recognize the need to reinterpret their traditions anew in each generation, it they are to retain the devotion of their adherents, and, second, the strong sense present among the followers of these secular movements that they are meant to provide a source of significance and purpose in human life and a general pattern of behavior as a guide. The latter point is acknowledged quite explicitly by Lamont when he writes, referring to "traditional religion": "At its best it has given to [people] the opportunity of losing themselves in something greater than any individual and of finding themselves thereby in consecration to an ideal. This historic function of religion any present philosophy worthy of the name must fulfill." And since he is presenting Humanism as a philosophy it must be understood as intending to perform this religious function. Hence, in view of this admission, Humanism, even when set forth as a philosophy, is justifiably to be called a quasi-religion.

There is no doubt that the existence of evils rightly attributed to religious institutions and the clergy - suppression of free thought, acquiescence in the face of injustice, intolerance, and fanaticism - has been a powerful factor behind the formation of quasi-religions, and explains their tendency to take an anti-religious stance. To maintain the self-criticism necessary if one is to avoid ideology and the absolutizing of one's own position is very difficult in any situation, but especially in the case of the positive religions where a message believed to have a divine sanction is involved. It is important to notice that the exposure of these evils associated with religions and the protest against them has has not always come from hostile critics standing outside these religions. Biblical religion has a prophetic as well as a priestly side and some of the most severe criticism of religious beliefs and practices has come from men and women whose faith in the traditions they would purify is unquestioned. Paul Tillich understood the problem very well when he set forth what he called the "Protestant Principle" according to which religious institutions must see themselves not only as dispensers of divine judgment but as subject to and not exempt from the same judgment. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)


1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited article

Humanism as a 'Quasi-religion.'(Defining Humanism: The Battle Continues)


Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25,

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.