Back to the Future - Questions for the News Media from the Past

By Ghiglione, Loren | Law and Contemporary Problems, Autumn 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Back to the Future - Questions for the News Media from the Past


Ghiglione, Loren, Law and Contemporary Problems


I

The alleged rape by three members of the Duke University lacrosse team led to extensive coverage by media voices as different as CNN Headline News's Nancy Grace (billed as "the feisty former prosecutor") and the more sedate "Gray Lady," The New York Times. Critics of the coverage often charge that most of the media, however different, fell victim to similar journalistic sins.

First, the media ignored the basic principles of Journalism 101: Report accurately and fairly; admit what you do not know; never assume; treat sources, however official, with skepticism; and verify, verify, verify.

Second, the media abandoned prudence for a presumption of guilt. At best, it feigned neutrality and skepticism. Reporters regurgitated the rush-to-judgment rants by the office of District Attorney Michael Nifong and the Durham Police Department. So early press accounts incorrectly reported from official sources: (a) "really, really strong evidence" (1) of rape when no evidence existed; (b) the refusal of all forty-six white lacrosse players to cooperate with police (no player refused); and (c) the players' denial of "participation or knowing anything" (2) (the players interviewed had described in detail what had taken place).

Third, the media exhibited stereotypes about lacrosse players. In Until Proven Innocent: Political Correctness and the Shameful Injustices of the Duke Lacrosse Rape Case, Stuart Taylor Jr. and KC Johnson wrote that even journalists who usually shunned gender and racial stereotypes portrayed lacrosse players as almost exclusively white, rich, conceited, and thuggish--"a bad bunch, and probably racists to boot." (3)

Fourth, the media fit the "Duke lacrosse rape" storyline into a centuries-old narrative pattern of innocent, African American, female victims--Sally Hemmings-era slaves and the antebellum South's black women. (4) Early accounts of the case portrayed the accuser as "a poor African-American mother struggling to work her way through college." (5) The Raleigh News & Observer never once used the word "alleged" in describing the "sexual violence" against the virtuous victim, the exotic dancer with two children and a "full class load at N.C. Central University." (6)

Fifth, the media presumed a related storyline about the predominantly white, criminal-justice system--that, especially in the South, the system stood for racial injustice and comforted the already comfortable, ruling whites--here, the Duke lacrosse players. Memories persisted of the trials of the Scottsboro Boys--black teens accused of raping two Alabama white women in 1931--and the 1955 murder of Emmett Till, a fourteen-year-old black, for whistling at a Mississippi white woman.

The false prosecution of the three lacrosse players for rape reminded blogger William L. Anderson and others of the two-decade-old case of African American Tawana Brawley. (Anderson called the Duke case Tawana Brawley II. (7)) Brawley, then fifteen, had accused three white men--including a police officer--of repeatedly raping her. Brawley had been missing from her home in Wappingers Falls, New York, for four days. She was found lying in a garbage bag, her clothing ripped and burned, her body covered with feces and racial epithets written on her in a black, charcoal-like substance. (8) The story, it was later revealed, was a hoax.

Brawley's team of lawyers and advisers starred the Reverend Al Sharpton and the attorney Alton Maddox. In reviewing media coverage of the team's statements, a book by The New York Times reporters assigned to the case faulted the media for building into a national story the baseless charges from a Maddox-Sharpton press conference. (9) Maddox said Brawley had been "lured into an automobile" and sexually assaulted. (10) Sharpton called the attack "the most shameful act of racism of our times." (11) The Times reporters criticized both the "skillful exploitation of television and the press" and the news media's failure to challenge the inflammatory Sharpton and Maddox.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Back to the Future - Questions for the News Media from the Past
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?