Towards Community-Based Monitoring in Manitoba's Hog Industry

By Moyer, Joanne; Fitzpatrick, Patricia et al. | Canadian Public Administration, December 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Towards Community-Based Monitoring in Manitoba's Hog Industry

Moyer, Joanne, Fitzpatrick, Patricia, Diduck, Alan, Froese, Beverly, Canadian Public Administration

Rapid changes in hog production in Manitoba are occurring within the context of an outdated regulatory framework and uncertain social and environmental impacts and are thus giving rise to a significant gap in public policy (Public Interest Law Centre 2007). Recognizing these challenges, in 2006, the provincial government imposed a temporary, partial moratorium on the expansion of the industry and charged the Clean Environment Commission (CEC), an arm's-length, quasi-judicial agency, with undertaking a review of the sustainability of the hog industry in the province.

We contend that a comprehensive community-based monitoring program would enhance the sustainability of the industry. Community-based monitoring is a form of alternative service delivery that provides a promising solution to environmental problems characterized by uncertainty, complexity and conflict (Ludwig 2001; Diduck 2004). It is a collaborative approach that combines a broad range of functions and activities to produce a comprehensive data set in a participatory manner. Furthermore, being community-based, this approach provides an encouraging response to issues of non-point source pollution (contaminants without a clearly defined origin) created by the hog industry. As such, we argue that the provincial government should develop and implement such a program and, by doing so, would close a glaring policy gap in its resource management regime.

The first part of this article provides a brief overview of the issues in Manitoba's hog industry and summarizes the Clean Environment Commission's mandate in its review. Next, we discuss aspects of environmental monitoring, emphasizing the shortcomings of conventional enforcement monitoring and counterpoising two alternative models. We then offer a rundown of one of these models--namely, community-based monitoring--and then outline the potential benefits of adopting community-based monitoring in Manitoba's hog industry. The fifth part of the article outlines existing legislative provisions upon which a community-based monitoring program could be based and then describes a strategy for developing such a program. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of community-based monitoring for the sustainability of Manitoba's hog industry and other sectors grappling with non-point sources of pollution.

Our research methods included an in-depth literature review that encompassed scholarly literature, publications from government and nongovernmental organizations, a qualitative content analysis of documents presented at recent public hearings in Manitoba and elsewhere, and a detailed review of primary and secondary legislation governing livestock production in Manitoba.

Hog production and the Clean Environment Commission review

Historically, agriculture has played a key role in Manitoba's economy and continues to do so today. Since the 1970s, however, the province's primary agricultural activity has shifted from the cultivation of grains to industrial hog production, spurred by depressed grain prices, higher shipping costs and a rising demand for pork (Livestock Stewardship Panel 2000; Ramsey and Everitt 2001; Novek 2003). This shift has been actively promoted by the provincial government, which recognized that inexpensive grain for feed and a large acreage of cultivated land that can be used for waste assimilation creates a "Manitoba advantage" (Diduck and Mitchell 2003; Novek 2003). The expansion of the hog industry in Manitoba has been characterized by larger, more intensive operations, the vertical integration of the industry, and an increase in corporate ownership. These changes are part of broader trends in the economy that are fuelled by the globalization of agriculture (Qualman 2001; Ramsey and Everitt 2001; Novek 2003).

Larger, more intensive hog operations have introduced a host of environmental concerns.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Towards Community-Based Monitoring in Manitoba's Hog Industry


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?