User-Friendly Motivational Interviewing and Evidence-Based Supported Employment Tools for Practitioners

By Larson, Jonathon E. | The Journal of Rehabilitation, October-December 2008 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

User-Friendly Motivational Interviewing and Evidence-Based Supported Employment Tools for Practitioners


Larson, Jonathon E., The Journal of Rehabilitation


Individuals with psychiatric disabilities maintain 10% to 15% employment rates and report shorter job retention rates when compared to the general population (Anthony, Cohen, Farkas, & Gagen, 2002; Bricout, 2002; National Alliance for Mental Illness [NAMI], 2004). Despite low employment rates, individuals with psychiatric disabilities report a desire to work and consider employment an important recovery goal (Cook & Pickett, 1995; Crowther, Marshall, Bond, & Huxley, 2001; McQuilken et al., 2003; Mueser, Salyers, & Muser, 2001; Anthony & Rogers, 1995; Rogers, Walsh, Masotta, Danley, & Smith, 1991). Further, studies have demonstrated that employment decreases financial strain on mental health systems, reduces poverty, improved quality of life, increases self-esteem, and plays an important role in psychological health and social well-being (Arns & Linney, 1993; Baron, 2000; Lehman et al., 2002; Mueser et al., 1997).

Groups participating in Evidence-Based Supported Employment (EBSE) demonstrate a significant increase in work, between 40% and 60% employment rates (Crowther et al., 2001; Lehman et al., 2002; Bond et al., 2001; Cook & Razzano, 2000; Rogers, Anthony, Toole, & Brown, 1991; Becker & Drake, 1993, 2003; Bond, 1998, 2004; Bond, Drake & Becket, 1999; Drake, Becker, Biesanz, Wyzik, & Torrey, 1996; Honey, 2000; Lehman, 1995; Schneider, Heyman, & Turton, 2002). Five randomized controlled trials specifically on EBSE indicate three to five fold increases in employment rates and income (Drake et al., 1996, 1996b; Cook et al., 2005a, 2005b; Meisler & Williams, 1998).

On the other hand, 40%-60% do not obtain employment through EBSE. Possibly, EBSE provides effective services for individuals determined to locate employment; however, it lacks components to intervene with individuals demonstrating ambivalence about finding and maintaining work after they start EBSE. Employment outcomes may be related to perspectives on pros and cons of working rather than limitations of EBSE. Larson et al. (2007) described the ambivalence of individuals enrolled in EBSE; unemployed individuals reported 47 specific costs and benefits to work, Table 1, and employed individuals mentioned 25 distinct pros and cons, Table 2. These finding suggest the existence of ambivalence for individuals receiving EBSE, regardless of employment status. Furthermore, preliminary findings indicate a relationship between stages of change (pre-contemplation, contemplation, determination, action, maintenance, and relapse) and job offers, jobs obtained, and hourly wages (Larson, et al., In Press). In order to address these issues, employment practitioners may utilize Motivational Interviewing (MI), which has demonstrated effectiveness in resolving ambivalence and preparing individuals for goal and behavioral changes (Miller & Rollnick, 2002) across the stages of change. The primary purpose of this paper is to provide practitioners with a user-friendly intervention that integrates EBSE and MI into one service package.

Initially, we briefly define nine EBSE/MI methods and later in the paper we provide a discussion of how to apply these tools. The Intervention Matching Framework provides a model to match stage of change with either EBSE or MI, see Figure I. Practitioners utilize the Stages of Change Interview for Seeking Competitive Employment tool to identify an individual's stage of change related to employment, (See Appendix A). Motivational Interviewing offers a method to engage with individuals contemplating employment; MI assists individuals in preparing for life changes related to employment. Individuals unemployed for years may face ambivalence about their changing daily routine to fit the needs of employment; MI provides a mechanism for practitioners to address job ambivalence. Adapted from Miller and Rollnick (2002), the Costs and Benefits for Getting a Job tool assists practitioners in structuring a costs/benefits discussion with individuals identified as either pre-contemplating or contemplating employment, (See Appendix B).

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

User-Friendly Motivational Interviewing and Evidence-Based Supported Employment Tools for Practitioners
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?