(Mis)educating about "Mixed Race": Discourse on Multiraciality and the Prospects of Higher Education Policy

By Andrews, Matthew M.; Chun, Jeffrey | Asian American Policy Review, Annual 2007 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

(Mis)educating about "Mixed Race": Discourse on Multiraciality and the Prospects of Higher Education Policy


Andrews, Matthew M., Chun, Jeffrey, Asian American Policy Review


Introduction

The mixed-race issue, it would seem, is susceptible to being politically defined in a number of competing and contradictory ways. How will it be read in the immediate future?

In the above statement, scholar Michael Omi (2001, xii) warns of the possible cooptation of issues pertaining to mixed-race individuals (1) by those interested in advancing their particular political agendas. Ironically, not long after Michael Omi expressed these concerns, Ward Connerly, University of California (UC) regent and famed conservative political activist, would use the "mixed-race issue" to advance his own agenda. If one may recall, Connerly is best known for his anti-affirmative action policies, such as California's Proposition 209 and Michigan's recently passed Proposition 2. However, in the fall of 2004, Connerly directed his attention toward California's growing mixed-race population and proposed "that UC should collect data from potential students using a 'multi-racial' or 'multi-ethnic' check box and that the President should request that the OMB (Office of Management and Budget) revise its guidelines to permit this" (Regents of UC 2004, 11). Although Connerly, mixed race himself, purported to be speaking on behalf of mixed-race and multiracial-identified individuals, (2) when one takes into account his political record, one cannot help but question his intentions.

For Asian America's mixed-race members, such a critical outlook is especially important, given their growing numbers within both the Asian American and mixed-race populations. According to the 2000 census, of the 11.9 million individuals who identified as being of Asian heritage, 13.9 percent, or 1.7 million, identified with at least one other race. In addition, 24.3 percent of all individuals who identified with more than one race marked "Asian" as one of them (Jones and Smith 2001). Recent studies have shown that these numbers will only increase in coming years (Lee and Bean 2004). In fact, some scholars have projected that as high as 36 percent of the Asian American population will be of mixed racial heritage by 2050 (Smith and Edmonston 1997). Through analyzing issues surrounding the 2004 "Multiracial" category initiative, we call for a reassessment of popular understandings of multiraciality in an increasingly multiracial America. Recognizing that one of the most enduring characteristics of American higher education has been its commitment to "benefit society at large, both by advancing knowledge and by educating students who will, in turn, serve others," we propose how changes in higher education policy can serve as vital first steps in this process (Duderstadt and Womack 2003, 45).

Connerly's Racial Project

Michael Omi and Howard Winant's (1994) concept of a "racial project" provides a critical lens through which to frame Connerly's political record and his "multiracial" category initiative. According to Omi and Winant, understanding the dynamics of a racial project is to understand its linkage of structure with representation, for a racial project "is simultaneously an interpretation, representation, or explanation of racial dynamics, and an effort to reorganize and redistribute resources along particular racial lines" (56). Connerly's initiative for a multiracial category reveals his own "interpretation, representation, or explanation of racial dynamics." That is, we argue that multiraciality has joined anti-affirmative action policies as the vehicle by which Connerly relentlessly pursues his political campaign for colorblindness.

In a 15 November 2004 news article by Elysha Tenenbaum for The Daily Californian, Connerly asserted that "there are a significant number of people in California who consider themselves 'multiracial' ... That is their identity, and it is not sufficient for them to check several boxes and then leave it to the discretion of the University of California to decide how those several boxes are going to be collapsed into one for reporting purposes.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

(Mis)educating about "Mixed Race": Discourse on Multiraciality and the Prospects of Higher Education Policy
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?