C.19: An Act to Amend the Young Offenders Act and the Criminal Code - "Getting tougher?"(Canada)

By McGuire, Maureen | Canadian Journal of Criminology, April 1997 | Go to article overview

C.19: An Act to Amend the Young Offenders Act and the Criminal Code - "Getting tougher?"(Canada)


McGuire, Maureen, Canadian Journal of Criminology


Background

The Young Offenders Act (Y.O.A.) came into force in 1984. Few, if any, statutes have received as much attention. The Y.O.A. is often at the centre of town hall debate, media scrutiny, and scholarly analysis. Critics and champions abound.

Complaints that the Act affords young persons too much leniency compete equally with complaints against the criminalization of childhood. Calls to raise the maximum sentences available to young people are as strong as the protests against the reality that, in most circumstances, young people serve more time in custody than adults for similar offences. Advocates argue with enthusiasm that the drivers, not the vehicle, are to blame for the deficiencies in the system. Others support the Act, yet advocate its extension into areas where the government social net is fraying.

Amidst the controversy surrounding the Y.O.A., criminologists and other scholars strive to define the Act. Attempts to pigeonhole the philosophy or intent of the Act have filled volumes to date. There seems to be a determination within the academic community to discover a "true philosophy" beyond the words of the statute itself; to position it on the punitive-rehabilitative scale, or find its place amongst the justice, crime control, or welfare models. Whether any analysis can express the intent of the Y.O.A. any better than as enunciated in section 3, the Declaration of Principle,(1) it is likely that these efforts will continue.

It is clear that the Act incorporates aspects of both offender and offence orientations, and elements of the justice, crime control, and welfare models. The Declaration of Principle requires a balancing, or perhaps more accurately, a merging of these ideas. S.24(1) is one of the many reminders within the Act that all models need be given attention in its administration, as it directs courts to consider the protection of society, the seriousness of the offence, and the needs of the young person in making custodial dispositions.

The history of juvenile justice in Canada assists in identifying the direction we have chosen with respect to the various models. Since before Confederation, young offenders have received special treatment within the criminal justice system. The Juvenile Delinquents Act, (J.D.A.) was introduced in 1908, and remained relatively unchanged for almost 75 years. The J.D.A. took a welfare approach to youth crime, adopting a parens patriae philosophy. Section 38 of the Act directed that, "as far as practicable every juvenile delinquent shall be treated not as a criminal, but as a misdirected child, and one needing aid, encouragement, help, and assistance." The unique features of indeterminate sentencing and status offences indicated that justice and due process objectives had little relevance, while welfare concerns were primary. In 1982, the introduction of the Young Offenders Act reflected a shift in ideology and approaches to dealing with youth crime. The welfare approach maintains a strong presence in the Y.O.A., but the justice and crime control approaches have been given greater recognition and application.

C.19: The changes

The newly enacted C.19, An Act to Amend the Young Offenders Act and Criminal Code, S.C. 1995, continues in the direction set by the Young Offenders Act, away from the welfare models of justice, toward a crime control model. The amendments as a whole send a clear message to youth courts that the justice system is not a safety net for failing educational, mental health, and child protection systems. The changes to the Act remind those involved in the youth justice system that the Young Offenders Act provides a means for dealing with youthful offenders, not a means for fixing "broken" children.

Although the replacement of the Juvenile Delinquents Act with the Young Offenders Act in 1982 was heralded as a dramatic change in principle, with the abolition of status offences and indeterminate sentences, some of the old approaches to dealing with youth crime persist. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

C.19: An Act to Amend the Young Offenders Act and the Criminal Code - "Getting tougher?"(Canada)
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.