Please update your browser

You're using a version of Internet Explorer that isn't supported by Questia.
To get a better experience, go to one of these sites and get the latest
version of your preferred browser:

Sovereignty versus Soundness: Cross-Border/interstate Banking in the European Union and in the United States: Similarities, Differences and Policy Issues

By Garcia, Gillian G. H. | Contemporary Economic Policy, January 2009 | Go to article overview

Sovereignty versus Soundness: Cross-Border/interstate Banking in the European Union and in the United States: Similarities, Differences and Policy Issues


Garcia, Gillian G. H., Contemporary Economic Policy


I. INTRODUCTION

The winds of mergers and acquisitions (M&As) have again been gusting across many of the world's businesses--racing across industries and borders. The Commission of the European Communities (2007) in its annual survey of mergers worldwide noted that the number and value of transactions across the globe had crested at the turn of the century, had then declined, but had recovered to peak levels by 2006 (1). The European Union (EU) Commission also noted that while the majority of deals were domestic and were conducted within the same industry, the numbers and values of cross-border M&As were growing. Nevertheless, state preferences regarding consolidation vary on both continents, particularly with respect to acquisitions across borders. (2)

Consolidation is also under way in the financial services industry but has occurred more often within a particular branch of that industry and within a country. The European Central Bank (ECB, 2007a) has noted that financial sector deals that cross industries or cross borders, and especially those that span both borders and industries, are less common (see also Group of Ten, 2001). Again, country preferences differ. Some members of the EU have welcomed foreign acquisitions of their banks. (3) Nevertheless, the EU has expressed concern over the slow pace of cross-border consolidation (Commission, 2005b), particularly in the retail banking markets (ECB, 2007a). Similarly, states within the United States have shown different degrees of enthusiasm for entry by out-of-state banks.

When an EU bank wants to begin operating in another member country, it can do so by acquiring an existing bank that is already in business there or by establishing a de novo branch or subsidiary. Similarly, a U.S. bank, or its holding company that has its headquarters in one state can choose to acquire a bank in another state or establish a de novo branch or subsidiary there. The article explores similarities and differences in the experiences of such cross-border banks in the EU with those of interstate banks in the United States. Section II compares the banking industries in the two unions. Section III summarizes the steps they have each taken to remove barriers to cross-border activity. Section IV discusses the reasons for opposition to cross-border banking and the methods used to put that opposition into effect. Section V compares measures of progress toward integration in the two unions and finds that it has proceeded further in the United States than in the EU. Section VI discusses policy issues that arise in this regulated industry as banks cross borders. Section VII summarizes the findings and concludes that, despite progress, integration is not yet complete in either union.

II. BANKING IN THE TWO UNIONS

The United States is a mature, stable union, while the European community is more recent, having grown rapidly from the initial 6 members to the current 27. Table 1 summarizes the EU's development. Constraints on data availability cause this article to focus mainly on the EU-15-the 15 members that comprised the EU until 2004. (4)

TABLE 1

Development of the EU

1951: Treaty of Paris--Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands create the European Coal and Steel Community

1957: Treaty of Rome--the six countries form a European Economic Community (EEC) common market

1968: The EEC ends quotas/tariffs on EEC goods; frees capital movements "only to the extent necessary"

1973: Denmark, Ireland, and the United Kingdom join the EEC and Greece joins later, bringing membership to 10

1985: The EU Commission plans for a single market by the end of 1992

1986: Portugal and Spain join the EEC (12 members)

1987: The Single European Act aids free trade and is followed by 280 pieces of legislation within the next 5 yr to establish the single market with partially liberalized capital movements

1992: The Maastricht Treaty forms the EU single market but with exception to Free capital movements

1994: Members' economic policies are to converge: the Deposit Insurance Directive partially harmonizes

1995: Austria, Finland, and Sweden join the EU to form the EU-15

1998: Austria, Belgium, Finland, France, Germany (Green in 2001), Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain form the EMU and the EU-12, under the ECB.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Sovereignty versus Soundness: Cross-Border/interstate Banking in the European Union and in the United States: Similarities, Differences and Policy Issues
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.