The Global Dimension of RFRA

By Neuman, Gerald L. | Constitutional Commentary, Spring 1997 | Go to article overview

The Global Dimension of RFRA


Neuman, Gerald L., Constitutional Commentary


A multi-faceted controversy is currently raging over the constitutionality of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA),(1) the federal legislative response to the Supreme Court's decision in Employment Division v. Smith.(2) In Smith, the Supreme Court eliminated most constitutional claims to religious exemption from generally applicable laws, abandoning a prior practice of subjecting such claims (verbally at least) to a compelling interest test. The majority asserted that the Free Exercise Clause does not require state or federal governments to accommodate conscientious objectors to compliance with generally applicable laws. Congress, in turn, emphasized that "laws 'neutral' toward religion may burden religious exercise as surely as laws intended to interfere with religious exercise," and acted to "restore the compelling interest test" as a matter of statutory right.(3)

Congress's authority to enact such a statute, particularly as applied to generally applicable laws of the states, has been disputed. The legislative history of RFRA indicates congressional belief that its interference with state laws could be justified as an exercise of enforcement authority under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. Several commentators have questioned this justification, arguing that Congress's reinstatement of a vision of religious liberty that the Supreme Court had just rejected stretches Section 5 authority beyond tolerable limits. The question of the source of congressional authority has acquired further salience as a result of the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Lopez,(4) reasserting the doctrine of enumerated powers as a guide to the interpretation of the Commerce Clause and invalidating a purported congressional exercise of commerce power for the first time since the New Deal. The Court has accepted a case raising such a challenge to RFRA in its current term.(5)

Thus far, analysts have generally assumed that Section 5 provides the only possible basis for a broad federal intervention to protect religious dissenters across a wide range of state governmental activities. Fanciful defenses under the Commerce Clause might have been framed before Lopez, but they would clearly fail today.

Characteristically, constitutional commentators have neglected the global dimension of religious liberty. Religious freedom is a matter of international concern, and the United States has recently adhered to a major human rights treaty that addresses the question of religious exemptions. Consequently, an overlooked source of authority for RFRA, or for a RFRA-like statute, lies in Congress's power to implement the treaty obligations of the United States. The main purpose of this essay is to call attention to this perspective on the RFRA debate. If it also helps sensitize constitutional lawyers to the United States, international human rights obligations, then that is all to the good.

I. RFRA AND ITS PROBLEMS

As readers probably recall, the majority opinion in Smith offered a surprising reanalysis of the Supreme Court's Free Exercise Clause cases. Alfred Smith had been denied unemployment compensation after having been fired from his job due to his use of peyote as a matter of ritual within the Native American Church, in violation of Oregon law.(6) The majority held that his violation of a generally applicable criminal statute provided an adequate basis for denying him unemployment compensation, and that his religious beliefs did not entitle him to any exemption from the statute. Religiously motivated actions are constitutionally shielded against laws that "ban [them] only when they are engaged in for religious reasons, or only because of the religious belief that they display,"(7) but not against generally applicable prohibitions. The majority declined to examine whether the denial of a religious exemption was necessary to the achievement of a compelling government interest, the standard articulated in numerous cases since Sherbert v. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Global Dimension of RFRA
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.