Race Rage and Denial: The Media and the O.J. Trials

By Fairfield, Charles | The Humanist, May-June 1997 | Go to article overview

Race Rage and Denial: The Media and the O.J. Trials


Fairfield, Charles, The Humanist


There were remarkable contrasts between the media coverage of the verdicts in the criminal trial of O. J. Simpson and the civil proceedings. The contrast was not in the amount of attention paid to either event, as the most astonishing aspect of this whole affair remains how permanently affixed these mostly inconsequential trials became to our daily television rituals. Instead, the contrast was between the reactions to the two verdicts and, by implication, the contrasting descriptions of how whites and African Americans viewed these cases. The coverage was marked by dramatic and questionable generalizations about the views of each community toward the trials, law enforcement, the justice system, and each other. The O.J. trials exposed the double standards of a media system obsessed by celebrity and unable to tackle the difficult issues raised by such events.

The most important facet of the O.J. saga, and the so called national dialogue on race which ensued, is how it high lighted the abject failure of the mainstream media to provide an effective and meaningful forum for public discussion of even the most basic information about our society and the world. But the media didn't fail simply because they are populated by a variety of elites and professionals who appeared content to merely keep track of every minute detail of the proceedings while preening and posturing for their audiences. The choices made in the coverage--to concentrate on individual personalities and downplay the interconnections between concepts like race, justice, and official corruption--were based upon a disastrous set of priorities that have increasingly animated news and public affairs programming in the mainstream media over the last two decades.

RAGE AND CELEBRATION

When the jury in the criminal trial re turned its verdict, the mainstream media resonated with a multitude of anecdotal images completing a script that had been hinting darkly about America's "racial divide" since the end of the Bronco chase. Some of the images were truly stirring and most were emotionally charged: African Americans were seen to be enmeshed in a jubilant celebration, while rooms full of crestfallen whites were presented to demonstrate what our most available commentators reported as the shocking and inviolable gap in perception between these two worlds. In turn, there quickly appeared a palpable sense of panic in some spheres of American society while in others there appeared to exist a feeling of retribution. At least that is what the torrent of imagery was supposed to suggest. Reality has since proven itself to be far more complex.

The intensity of the celebrations in African American communities was supposed to be in direct proportion to the "hidden rage" that has existed in these communities for decades. The marker of race relations most often cited as a possible parallel to the O.J. trial was the violent reaction to the acquittal of the Los Angeles police officers who were videotaped beating Rodney King. Many commentators worried that a guilty verdict in Simpson's criminal trial would provoke a similar reaction. But as Patricia J. Williams notes in a March 1995) Nation, the fact that these fearful predictions jostled for media space with official reports admitting to tremendous police corruption in the Bronx and Harlem went unnoticed. As Williams argues, the fear of black civil unrest and violence "reduces black anxiety about the justice system to superficial and singular television encounters" and "dangerously misreads the discontent of a significant population that is not merely disaffected but enraged, whose fury is barely reflected in the staggering rates of black criminalization and imprison meet."

But few picked up on Williams' sentiments. Instead, reporters seized on polling data which indicated the now cliche differences in perception between blacks and whites. These polls were cited repeatedly and became frozen in time: blacks said not guilty; whites said guilty. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Race Rage and Denial: The Media and the O.J. Trials
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.