The Grand Inquisitors

By Pettifer, Ann | The Humanist, May-June 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

The Grand Inquisitors

Pettifer, Ann, The Humanist

Fourteen percent of the American population, given the opportunity, would impose a Christian theocracy on the country. This figure comes from a survey conducted in 1996 by the Gallup International Institute for the American Jewish Committee, the latter having good historical reason to get the wind up when Christian nationalists are on the move.

Formerly separated, Catholics and Protestants are busy burying the hatchet and avoiding old doctrinal differences in the pursuit of a common political vision: one nation of clean cut, conformist subjects ruled by an omniscient, punitive male deity. The god they obviously have in mind is the one who dispatched "his only begotten son" into the world to get slaughtered so as to ransom the rest of us.

How worried should the rest of us be--the 86 percent who would prefer not to live under the 14 percent's god? Realistically, are these new Christian nationalists all that scary?

If the movement was simply a back water phenomenon led by polyester suited, blow dried chaps of the Pat Boone variety, we might rest more easily at night. As it is, the leaders are slick, influential types, masters of propaganda whose goal is the defense and maintenance of a largely unfettered free market. However, as the country comes increasingly under the pressure of the destabilizing forces that the free market brings in its wake, the drive is on to identify scapegoats. The constant bar rage of sermons on the phantom decline in morals is a ploy to distract folk from focusing on their economic woes. The elite shaping and directing this movement is comprised of powerful, well connected white men. One of them--Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia--has already decried the enemy in the context of a Kultur Kampf out to sabotage the country's "cherished Christian beliefs."

Also in the Catholic column are Father Richard John Neuhaus, Michael Navak, and the Cardinal Archbishop of New York, John O'Connor. Neuhaus and Novak are seasoned barkers for American corporations. Neuhaus edits the Christian Capitalist's house journal, First Things, which is busy banging the drum, warning of the end of democracy and flushing out the usual subjects: liberal legislators, feminists, and homosexuals. In Leninist mode, Neuhaus has revolution on his mind: "Only the church collectively can decide at what point a government becomes sufficiently corrupt that a believer must resist.... revolution can be justified from a Christian viewpoint." For years, he and Novak meddled in politics via their Institute on Religion and Democracy which, during the 1980s, helped to micro manage American colonialism in Central America, giving succor to murderous U.S. satraps.

Failed Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork is another member of the pack; he serves as a pamphleteer for the Christian nationalist agenda. This man is a serious hater. His wretched, mis-anthropic screed, Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline, had even the usually cool New York Times reviewer Michiko Kakutani in a lather. Appalled by such pronouncements as "The desire for equality is in large part rooted in self pity and envy," Kakutani dismissed Bork's book as "ugly and intemperate."

One of the more disturbing aspects of this whole spectacle is the confusion these religious nationalists generate in stretches of the secular media. Be cause they crusade under the Christian flag, the supposition is made that they are, indeed, what they say they are: namely, Christians. The truth is otherwise. There is about all these men a touch of Dickensian caricature; they are villains in the Victorian utilitarian mold of a Josiah Bounderby. However, their strategy for the revolution--the subjugation of the American demos--owes more to a book written by John Locke in the seventeenth century (another period of social and economic upheaval).

In The Reasonableness of Christianity, Locke advances the idea that Christianity is an excellent lever for social control.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

The Grand Inquisitors


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?