Dorothy Richardson's Foreword to 'Pilgrimage.'
Thomson, George H., Twentieth Century Literature
Monstrously, when I began, I felt only that all masculine novels to date, despite their various fascinations, were somehow irrelevant, & the feminine ones far too much influenced by masculine traditions, & too much set upon exploiting the sex-motif as, hitherto, seen & depicted by men.
- Dorothy Richardson(1)
Though it is complex, fragmentary, and oblique, qualities that in other modernist writers have elicited intense scrutiny, the 1938 foreword to Pilgrimage(2) has aroused little critical interest. One reason is its compression. In just four pages, Dorothy Richardson places Pilgrimage in the context of a very foreshortened history of realism (paragraphs 1 to 4), describes its genesis as a new kind of realist fiction (paragraphs 5 to 7), surveys the critical reception of this new realism (paragraphs 8 to 12), and apologizes for the inconveniences her novel has inflicted on its readers (paragraphs 13 to 15). The difficulties of so condensed a treatment are exacerbated by an ironic tone, judgmental stance, and involuted style. It is small wonder that so unforthcoming a document should have invited neglect rather than scrutiny.
Richardson's publishers, J. M. Dent and The Cresset Press, had hoped her introduction would give readers a fresh entry into her masterwork and help sell it to a wider audience. They were disappointed on both counts. Though she had dedicated her life to self-revelation through Pilgrimage, Dorothy Richardson dreaded the explicit self-exposure now asked of her. In December 1937 she wrote to Bryher: "I struggle to put together some sort of foreword for Pil. the most horrible job I ever attempted" (Windows 341). The result, a reluctant and tight-lipped summation of her artistic achievement, defied the deepest impulse of her creative work: her belief that all novels were expressive of the author, were in an important way autobiographical. Her young heroine, in the first flush of discovering this truth, exclaimed to herself: "I don't read books for the story, but as a psychological study of the author. . . . In a book the author was there in every word" (P 1: 384). Pilgrimage is not just "saturated in the personality of the author" (Wells 865) but saturated in the experiences of the author, taken rather directly from her life.(3) The foreword, then, should have been the crown of this deeply autobiographical enterprise, a statement of the way she as writer conceived and developed the personal subject of her novel. Instead, it was an act of obfuscation, a reluctant manifesto that managed to obscure even its most important truth, the announcement of Pilgrimage as a new kind of feminine fiction.
The foreword, then, is in need of decoding. The first task is to set down as precisely as possible what Dorothy Richardson is saying. The second is to locate historically her account of the genesis of Pilgrimage within the context of its 1912 time period. That will make possible a view of the foreword as an obliquely self-revealing preface to an ambitious autobiographical work of fiction. So viewed it may help us to understand better one of the major experimental novels of the twentieth century.
Detailed analysis is needed to piece out the complicated and sometimes elusive sentences of the foreword. The number for each paragraph will, where appropriate, precede my discussion.
1. Dorothy Richardson's brief survey of realism begins with Balzac. Though the ambitious scope of his essay on Les forces humaines dictates that he employ character types (who illustrate social forces), he is the father of realism because his imagination unites him so powerfully with his characters and settings.
2. Ignoring further developments in France and passing over those in England from George Eliot to George Gissing, Dorothy Richardson announces Arnold Bennett as the first English follower of Balzac.
3. She next distinguishes these founding realists from those who follow them in England. Balzac and Bennett, through the act of choosing their particular subject matter, themselves represent the human spirit turning inward on itself. (The word represent refers not to their subject matter but to themselves in the act of choosing such subject matter.) They themselves embody and express the human spirit turning inward. In so doing they may be called realists by nature rather than design, whereas their immediate successors possess a conscious creed. The aim of these successors is to represent life as seen through mirrors of plain glass. The paradoxical nature of this image is Dorothy Richardson's way of undermining the later realists' simple-minded notion of objective representation. These mirrors of plain glass, so the realists believe, replace the rose-colored lenses of the romance writers' telescopes.
4. By 1911 the realistic novel, though not yet wholly documentary, is largely devoted to explicit satire and protest against all conventional social forms and relations. The protagonist (who resembles his creator?) is represented biographically in the third person or autobiographically in the first person. The focus of the realistic novel, its cause celebre, is Man versus those social and environmental conditions which are claimed to be the sources of his discontent.
The rationale for this brief survey of realism is not at first glance apparent. To begin with, in writing about Balzac, what does Dorothy Richardson mean by imagination? Miriam asks the same question in March Moonlight: "Imagination? Not in the sense of making up. Imagination means holding an image in your mind. When it comes up of itself, or is summoned by something. Then it is not outside, but within you. And if you hold it, steadily, for long enough, you could write about it for ever" (P 4: 613). It is not probable that each and every one of Balzac's characters is a self-portrait and that each of his backgrounds is personally experienced. Dorothy Richardson only asserts that each character has the quality, the unique individuality, of a self-portrait and that each setting has a similar uniqueness of detail. But when she goes on to Arnold Bennett and says that he "portrays with complete fidelity the lives and adventures of inconspicuous people," she implies that his novels have their source in direct personal …
The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia
Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:
- Questia's entire collection
- Automatic bibliography creation
- More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
- Ad-free environment
Already a member? Log in now.
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information:
Article title: Dorothy Richardson's Foreword to 'Pilgrimage.'.
Contributors: Thomson, George H. - Author.
Journal title: Twentieth Century Literature.
Volume: 42.
Issue: 3
Publication date: Fall 1996.
Page number: 344+.
© 1999 Hofstra University.
COPYRIGHT 1996 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.
- Georgia
- Arial
- Times New Roman
- Verdana
- Courier/monospaced
Reset