Subprime CDO Ratings and the Current Financial Crisis: A Modeling Perspective: Models Used by Rating Agencies Were Inadequate to Assess the Credit Risks of Subprime Mortgages in a Turbulent Housing Market. A Model Based on Housing Market Price Risks Might Be an Alternative to the Rating Agencies' Models

By Kim, Yong | The RMA Journal, October 2008 | Go to article overview

Subprime CDO Ratings and the Current Financial Crisis: A Modeling Perspective: Models Used by Rating Agencies Were Inadequate to Assess the Credit Risks of Subprime Mortgages in a Turbulent Housing Market. A Model Based on Housing Market Price Risks Might Be an Alternative to the Rating Agencies' Models


Kim, Yong, The RMA Journal


UNLIKE PAST DOWNTURNS in the housing market cycle, this one has caused havoc in financial markets because of write-offs on securities linked to subprime mortgages. Write-downs could reach as high as $400 billion. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) said recently that the cost of the crisis might approach $1 trillion. There is plenty of blame to go around. Investors, lenders, borrowers, and rating agencies all bear responsibility.

Given the size of the market failure, it's fair to question the methodology that the rating agencies used to assign credit ratings to subprime collateralized debt obligation (CDO) tranches. Between 2005 and the third quarter of 2007, about 80% of all subprime mortgages were converted into AAA pools. A vehicle backed by subprime mortgages could borrow 80% of notional amount at AAA rates. One may wonder how it is possible to create AAA-rated instruments out of B-rated paper.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The secret recipe for this magical conversion is that there are many junior-class notes rated lower than AAA. In fact, there must be at least one class note known as the equity piece that is not even rated (and thus rated lower than B). Cash flows from mortgages are paid to the most senior notes first, then to the next senior notes, and so on. On the other hand, if home owners default, the most junior notes get hit. And if the most junior notes cannot absorb the losses completely, then the next junior notes are affected, and so on, climbing up the ladder. Of course, the most junior notes receive the highest interest rate to compensate for absorbing risk.

CDO Rating Models

The rating agencies relied on CDO rating models in slicing/ dicing and assessing the credit risks of CDO tranches. CDO rating models are ratings-based mathematical models that, to most investors, in some way mysteriously generate ratings.

In the past, CDO rating models were used mostly for evaluating CDOs for corporate debt. Moody's first developed a CDO rating model, the binomial expansion technique (BET), which became the most popular tool for rating CDO products, including CDOs for subprime mortgages. The model generates the number of defaulted loans/ bonds in a pool with the frequency of occurrences if loans/ bonds of the collateral are more or less homogeneous in probability of default (PD) and exposure, and if defaults of loans/bonds are independent events. For example, for a pool of 100 loans, the probability of only one loan default over the maturity is very low, and so is the probability that 99 loans will default. In reality, the underlying pools are not homogeneous, and there is a tendency for many loans to default at the same time.

The key idea of BET is to map the real portfolio into a hypothetical homogeneous portfolio by calculating the average PD of the exposures and the diversity score. The diversity score summarizes the degree of homogeneity of the real portfolio. More importantly, it reflects the default correlation among loans by replacing the number of loans in the pool. From the previous example, if the diversity score is 50, the frequency of the number of defaulted loans is calculated as if there are only 50 loans in the pool. All the model requires to set the calculation are ratings or PDs of loans/bonds. Other rating models, some more sophisticated than others, also operate based on ratings or PDs.

For corporate credits, ratings-based CDO models performed adequately. After all, corporate creditworthiness is well researched by rating agencies; it's their primary job. The question is whether these models can be applied to evaluate default risks of subprime CDO tranches.

Ratings of Subprime CDO Tranches in CDO Rating Models

If assigning ratings required familiarity with mathematical models, it would be impossible for general investors to assess creditworthiness of subprime CDO notes. Using ratings assigned by rating agencies, however, allows investors to benchmark what they paid for. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Subprime CDO Ratings and the Current Financial Crisis: A Modeling Perspective: Models Used by Rating Agencies Were Inadequate to Assess the Credit Risks of Subprime Mortgages in a Turbulent Housing Market. A Model Based on Housing Market Price Risks Might Be an Alternative to the Rating Agencies' Models
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.