Listening on All Sides: Toward an Emersonian Ethics of Reading

By Gross, Daniel M. | Philological Quarterly, Summer 2007 | Go to article overview

Listening on All Sides: Toward an Emersonian Ethics of Reading


Gross, Daniel M., Philological Quarterly


Listening on All Sides: Toward an Emersonian Ethics of Reading by Richard Deming. Stanford U. Press, 2007. Pp. 182. $50.

At the same time that we moderns learned about living in regimes of vision that include spectacle (Guy Debord, Laura Mulvey), panopticon (Foucault), and print (Walter Ong), our literary criticism skewed towards vision at the expense of the other senses, especially hearing. Think of the close reading that runs from the New Criticism to deconstruction and beyond, or what Charles Bernstein calls the "Euclidean" prosody of most modern poetics (Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word [Oxford U. Press, 1998]). Ironically, we still see evidence for this hearing loss in recent literary criticism such as Richard Deming's Listening on All Sides: Toward an Emersonian Ethics of Reading, which, like Helen Vendler's Invisible Listeners: Lyric Intimacy in Herbert, Whitman, and Ashbery (Princeton U. Press, 2005), paradoxically inscribes a regime of vision into its very title. For her part, Vendler regularly reduces listeners to readers through an aggressive form of synesthesia common in our critical moment when readerly interpretation, engagement, and understanding are usually figured visually. For instance her architecture for the eye situates the lyric poem's addressee "in the room" or out, rather than maintaining a distinctly aural orientation characteristic of the material she examines, including most obviously George Herbert's devotional lyric ("Heaven / O who will show me those delights on high? / Echo. / I") or Walt Whitman's bardic persona ("O you singer solitary, singing by yourself, projecting me, / O solitary me listening, nevermore shall I cease perpetuating you"). Despite the recent emergence of sound studies in the literary humanities by way of Bruce Smith and Charles Bernstein, among others, the ear is regularly collapsed into more sophisticated epistemologies and practices of the eye despite all efforts to the contrary.

In fits and starts, Richard Deming's book advances a project of sensual reorientation in the spirit of Stanley Cavell's ordinary language philosophy, and his achievements are noteworthy in a few directions, including a sophisticated intertextuality, a knack for aphorisms, and most importantly a contribution to literary ethics where the ear can play a central role.

Articulating "Emersonian modernism," Deming thoughtfully sets Hawthorne, Melville, Wallace Stevens, Whitman, and William Carlos Williams in conversation with Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Heidegger, among others, marking where a European sense for historical consciousness informs, and is informed by, a distinctly American project of skepticism and innovation. Sometimes these connections follow the traditional contours of influence as when Emerson reads Hegel and in turn Nietzsche reads Emerson, and sometimes the connections expand to inform Deming's own efforts "to find and even make new vocabularies new tools ... in order to find new ways to address and respond to (and thus be responsible for) the world" (26). More than an informative interpretation of canonic literature, Deming positions his book as an act of literature itself. Unnecessary complications follow, such as the effort to fold in too much material without adequate room left for argument or explanation--the stuff of mere information, I suppose--as with the sequence of two pages that lurch inexplicably from Wittgenstein to Wordsworth to Shelley to Blake to Williams at the same time that Deming generates aphorisms that crystallize his thought and complicate his relationship to his myriad interlocutors. Who says "interrogatives are one manner of delineating the gaps between groups of language users" (25)? I love this aphorism, which resonates with the insight of Cavell's explanation in A Pitch of Philosophy: Autobiographical Exercises (Harvard U. Press, 1994) that J. L. Austin's stories required an "ear" in the most technical sense. Deming in fact thematizes the ambiguity of the speaking agent and thus this question of attribution might seem unfair.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Listening on All Sides: Toward an Emersonian Ethics of Reading
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.