Consumer Skepticism and Online Reviews: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective

By Sher, Peter J.; Lee, Sheng-Hsien | Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, February 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Consumer Skepticism and Online Reviews: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective


Sher, Peter J., Lee, Sheng-Hsien, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal


The use of the Internet as a channel for expressing opinions on products has become an important marketing tool to compete for consumer attention and visits (Chatterjee, 2001). With the declining trust in advertising, Word of Mouth (WOM) has become the most influential communication channel. As an electronic form of WOM, online consumer reviews provide a trusted source of product information for consumers--and therefore a potentially valuable sales asset. Positive consumer reviews on product or company are one of the best predictors of business growth (Keller, 2007). However, little is known about how online messages influence the purchasing intention of consumers (Chatterjee). The first purpose of the present study was to broaden understanding about effects of online reviews. By introducing the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) as a referent theory, this study contributes to the online behavior literature.

Obermiller and Spangenberg (1998) suggest a paradox whereby the nature of a free market encourages exaggerations in marketing messages which subsequently induces consumer skepticism. Through socialization and purchasing experiences, consumers come to believe or disbelieve marketing messages. In an empirical study, Calfee and Ringold (1994) found that the majority of consumers believe that advertising is often untrustworthy and accordingly discount claims made by advertisements. Although online reviews provide easy access to information about products and services, they also foster consumer skepticism. The fact that this new form of WOM is information from strangers whom the consumers have never met, and probably never will meet, casts doubt on the trustworthiness of these online messages. Therefore, considerable criticism has been directed at Internet information, especially online reviews. Chatterjee (2001) suggests that some online surfers even get paid for referrals or purchases and/or get advertising income from target firms. The second purpose of this study was to attempt to use consumer skepticism as a moderator to test the ELM hypotheses. Managerial implications are suggested.

Literature review

ELM The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) developed by Petty and Cacioppo (1981, 1986) provides a useful framework for understanding the effectiveness of persuasive communication. Based on the ELM, attitude change may occur via two routes of influence, the central route and the peripheral route. The two alternative routes differ in the amount of thoughtful processing of information or elaboration. Individuals taking the central route think critically about issue-related arguments and scrutinize the merits and relevance of those arguments before forming an attitude about the advertisement or product. Conversely, individuals taking the peripheral route make less cognitive effort and rely on shortcuts such as the number of arguments and physical attractiveness of endorsers when forming an attitude (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Petty and Wegener (1999) suggest that individuals in high elaboration likelihood state are more likely to engage in thoughtful processing of information and are also more likely to be persuaded by argument quality. People in low elaboration state tend to base their attitude change on peripheral cues. Elaboration likelihood moderates the effects of argument quality and peripheral cues on attitude change. According to the ELM, elaboration likelihood is determined by an individual's motivation and ability to elaborate. Motivation refers to the individual's personal relevance to the persuasive message while ability is manifest in the individual's cognitive competence or prior expertise with the attitude object. Individuals vary in their ability and motivation to elaborate. Skepticism Skepticism refers to the tendency toward disbelief (Obermiller & Spangenberg, 1998). Consumers come to believe or disbelieve marketing messages through socialization and purchasing experiences.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Consumer Skepticism and Online Reviews: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?