Recognizing Potential Law Enforcement Executives

By Gaston, Arnett | Corrections Today, June 1997 | Go to article overview

Recognizing Potential Law Enforcement Executives


Gaston, Arnett, Corrections Today


Jim Lundy, an internationally recognized expert in the identification, training and development of effective managers, has written a book titled Lead, Follow or Get Out of the Way. Given the increasing complexity of our nation's correctional agencies, it has become clear that we may have to adopt the philosophy suggested by the title of Lundy's book if we expect our agencies to be viable in the new millennium. Viability begins with the quality of leadership, and if correctional agencies are to avoid going the way of the dinosaur, leadership must be the best possible. Law enforcement agencies are recognizing a long-acknowledged need in private industry: the fast-tracking of managerial candidates.

This article summarizes findings from an exploratory study that contribute to developing a fast-track management system for law enforcement. The research formulated and tested a law enforcement executive management (LEEM) profile. The profile is based on the personality characteristics, skills, knowledge and abilities of demonstrably effective executives within an agency. It provides a good starting point for looking at career development issues in law enforcement.

Selection Methods

The criteria for selecting law enforcement executives today are not as sophisticated as they could be. Traditional selection from the ranks runs the risk of elevating individuals who are expert in the duties mastered through experience but who may be deficient due to a lack of exposure to the full range of expertise required by new executive functions. Selection from outside the department may introduce needed new talents and policies but could fail if the individual selected is unfamiliar with the traditions, policies or local culture of the new environment. Most law enforcement agencies do not have the luxury of granting potential managers educational leave or training sabbaticals. Agencies often select the people who are "in the right place at the right time" for high-risk jobs.

Research and field evidence indicate that effective executives learn to be effective through a maturation process where skills. knowledge and abilities are developed and enhanced. This is why, particularly in the private industry, significant resources are devoted to identifying and training those who demonstrate leadership potential. Given that executives are developed, not born, law enforcement, like private industry, needs to minimize the risk associated with current selection processes through a surer method to identify and measure management abilities.

The research described here was conducted under the Visiting Fellowship Program of the National Institute of Justice. The study developed some exploratory hypotheses about the personality, performance and skills that predict success in law enforcement management and leadership, based on the performance of existing executives. This study marks a pilot effort to discover traits exhibited by effective executives and to measure prospective candidates for promotion against these traits.

Findings supposed all three hypotheses presented:

* Certain management, personality, cognitive and "Type A" variables are significantly more widely represented among populations considered to be effective managers than in nonexecutives. These traits can be identified for management selection and development.

* Significant relationships appear between management-potential variables in the executive group which do not appear among the random sample of nonexecutive personnel chosen for comparison.

* Some individuals among the nonexecutive group display management potential similar to that exhibited by effective managers. Although relationships between desirable variables may reach significant levels in the nonexecutive group, they usually appear more strongly among executives.

Critical thinking ability at various ranks, ages and educational levels

Rank                 % scoring
                in deciles 7-9

Line staff                 17%
Supervisor 1               19%
Supervisor 2               21%
Executive 1                56%
Executive 2                75%
Executive 3                57%
Age Range            % scoring
                in deciles 7-9

21-25                      11%
2-30                       23%
31-35                      17%
36-40                      41%
41-45                      41%
46-50                      44%
51-55                      33%
56-60                      25%
Level of                                       % scoring
Higher Education                          in deciles 7-9

None                                                 17%
< 1 to 2 years undergraduate                         23%
2 to 4 years undergraduate, associate
degree, or both                                      12%
Bachelor's degree to 2 yerars beyond
bachelor's degree                                    38%
Master's or doctorate                                61%

Method of Research

The research formulated and tested the LEEM profile. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Recognizing Potential Law Enforcement Executives
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.