Legal Reporter

By Anderson, Teresa | Security Management, August 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Legal Reporter


Anderson, Teresa, Security Management


Judicial Decisions

Immunity. According to a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, prison guards employed by a private company are not qualified to receive immunity from prisoners' lawsuits. Because they are not employees of the state, private guards are not immune when prisoners sue for a violation of constitutional rights.

In 1994, Ronnie Lee McKnight, an inmate at the South Central Correctional Facility in Tennessee, filed a lawsuit claiming that two corrections officers, Daryll Richardson and John Walker, violated his constitutional rights to protection from cruel and unusual punishment. McKnight stated in court documents that the two officers, who were employed by Corrections Corporation of America, which manages the prison, tied his restraints too tightly during a prison transfer. The restraints, claimed McKnight, caused injuries serious enough to require hospitalization.

Richardson and Walker requested that the complaint be dismissed because, as correctional officers, they were entitled to immunity. The district court refused the request, ruling that the officers were not public employees but employees of a private, for-profit company and were not, therefore, entitled to qualified immunity. Richardson and Walker appealed.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court's decision. In ruling on the case, the court noted that while state-employed corrections officers do have qualified immunity, there is no legal precedent granting privately employed officers the same rights. The guards again appealed the decision.

In a five to four vote, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the appellate decision finding that the private prison guards do not enjoy the same immunity granted to state employees. According to the Court, immunity does not apply to private prison guards because "mere performance of a governmental function does not support immunity for a private person, especially one who performs a job without government supervision or direction."

The Court also noted that market pressures will help keep prison officials from being overly timid or too aggressive. Either of these conditions, wrote the Court, will result in the private company being replaced by another.

According to the guards' attorney, Chip Frensley of Nashville, Tennessee, the decision should not affect the number of cases filed or won by inmates. What will be affected is the number of cases that go to trial. Frensley notes that qualified immunity does not prevent inmates from pursuing legitimate claims, but it does allow a frivolous case to be dismissed early in the legal process. (McKnight v. Daryll Richardson and John Walker, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 96-318, 1997)

Telecommunications. The Communications Decency Act (CDA) of 1996, which made indecent electronic transmissions illegal, was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court because it violates First Amendment rights to free speech.

The law, passed as part of a telecommunications reform bill, would have held online service providers, network operators, and private business owners liable for indecent transmissions sent over their computer networks.

The lawsuit was filed against the government by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and twenty-seven individuals and organizations. The ACLU charged that the law was unconstitutional because it criminalized protected speech. For example, some literary and political documents available in libraries would be illegal under the law if transmitted electronically. Attorneys for the government argued that the law was necessary to protect minors from inappropriate material available via computer.

The government had requested that the Court preserve the CDA by cutting the offensive terms and allowing the law to stand. The Court refused to exercise this option, noting in the written opinion of the case that the law was too broad and too pervasive.

Sex discrimination.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Legal Reporter
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.