If It Ain't Broke ... Keep Your Amendments off My Constitution

By Cutler, Lloyd N. | The Washington Monthly, September 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

If It Ain't Broke ... Keep Your Amendments off My Constitution


Cutler, Lloyd N., The Washington Monthly


This book was commissioned by the Twentieth Century Fund in the belief that the American Constitution is under unfair attack from both the political left and right. The left is unhappy that the national government has done too little to meet what they consider to be our most pressing national problems -- urban poverty, environmental deterioration, inadequate and expensive health care, racial and gender discrimination -- and blames the Constitution for these perceived failures. The right is unhappy because the national government has done too much to tax away our income, reduce savings, increase the deficit, regulate minute details of our business activity and personal behavior, and discriminate in favor of minority groups; it also blames the Constitution for these perceived excesses. Both left and right urge corrective constitutional amendments. As Fund President Richard Leone explains in a short introduction, what is missing from the debate is a defense of the Constitution as it stands. It is the intent of The New Federalist Papers to make that case.

The original Federalist Papers have become almost as famous as the Constitution they explicate. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote them to persuade the new American states to ratify the federal charter drafted by the Philadelphia Convention. Originally published in the newspapers of the time, the Federalist Papers could easily have disappeared from view along with the rest of the daily news of the 1780s. Instead, they became our most important record of the formation of the republic. It is only a slight exaggeration to say that as the Bible is to the Creation, so the Federalist Papers are to the Constitution.

From time to time in our history, advocates and opponents of major changes in our political system have invoked the Federalist Papers Both North and South cited them during the run-up to the Civil War. After World War II, a group calling itself the World Federalists proposed a union of the major democracies around the globe (including China and South Africa). Boasting supporters such as Gen. George Marshall, Secretary of State John Foster Dulles, Supreme Court Justice Owen J. Roberts, and Sen. Estes Kefauver, the group proposed a federal charter based largely on the American Constitution, under which the United States would be one of 20-odd constituent states. To advocate the idea, retired Justice Roberts, Clarence Streit and J. Schmidt wrote The New Federalist Papers, published in 1950.

Now we have another set of New Federalist Papers, written by a more scholarly triumvirate: historian Alan Brinkley, political scientist Nelson W. Polsby, and constitutional law professor Kathleen M. Sullivan. Far from advocating so fundamental a change in our political structure as the Roberts-Streit-Schmidt proposal, the message this time is essentially to leave well enough alone. (One is reminded of the first Reform Act that democratized the electorate and make-up of the British Parliament; during the debate an opponent of the Bill argued: "Reform, Reform, why do we want Reform? Things are already bad enough as they are!")

A nonradical triad if ever there was one, Brinkley, Polsby, and Sullivan have written an admirable and highly readable volume of centrist political thought, providing a welcome antidote to what we've been hearing from the right and left. They see the flaws in our constitutional system, but they see its virtues as well. They recognize our failures to achieve policy outcomes as decisively as the parliamentary systems, but they blame these failures less on the Constitution than on the political structures that have evolved beneath it.

Original Intent

Polsby reminds us that while the framers modeled much of our Constitution on Montesquieu's concept of the "separation of powers" among the executive, the legislature, and the courts, they departed from his theory in one crucial respect. They did not lodge the executive power solely in the president, having suffered from the unchecked power of King George.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

If It Ain't Broke ... Keep Your Amendments off My Constitution
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?