Testing Sometimes Flunks

By Daniel, Diane | Editor & Publisher, August 23, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Testing Sometimes Flunks

Daniel, Diane, Editor & Publisher

Written tests for copy editors often fall short, but managers have few alternatives

IN THE 15 years I've worked in newsrooms, mostly as a copy editor but also as a reporter and assigning editor, I've been hired by seven newspapers.

I haven't been hired by even more because, more often than not, I was told I made the equivalent of a B, or sometimes a C, on the paper's copy-editing test. Perhaps if my current employer, the Boston Globe, tested me instead of having me try out for three days, I wouldn't be working there either.

At one paper, the St. Petersburg Times, I worked in a full-fane temporary slot for a year. At the end of my stint, my editor filled out a performance review, checking "yes" in the box reading: "Would you hire this person again?" I moved out of state, but the next year considered returning. The paper had just started testing editing candidates. Once again, my test performance was mediocre.

Newspapers have all but institutionalized the practice of testing copy editors. Testing, or certification, for certain professions, such as law, medicine, or real estate, is fairly straightforward and consistent. But at newspapers, individual editors devise their own tests -- some well thought-out, others thrown together from random sources and rarely updated, making some tests feel more like hoops one must jump through than professional guideposts.

Some papers put a lot of weight on test scores, while others rely equally on references, clips and interviews. The welcome consensus is that if all papers could afford to pay for candidates to try out -- in person, working on real stories -- that would be the best way to judge their journalistic skills. But in this era of belt-tightening, we know what that means -- more testing.

"When you're hiring someone, I wouldn't base it on a test. I don't agree with it," says Richard Holden, executive director of the Dow Jones Newspaper Fund and former copy desk chief for the Wall Street Journal. "When hiring editors at the Journal, there was no test at all, and they would come in and try out for a week."

Holden does, however, use a copy-editing test for his Dow Jones fund intern selection that he changes every year. In my book, he gets extra credit for the updating; some newspapers don't.

Old "current events" tests are one of the many problems I've encountered over the years. At the Atlanta Constitution, for instance, a pop-culture identification test I was given a few years ago for a features job hadn't been updated in several years. The paper no longer gives that test, says Jim Smith, chief of the copy desk.

Smith was responsible for eliminating a test on Southern culture, which another editor had required. It asked things like names of race-car drivers, and who caused Margaret Mitchell to die. To me that was totally irrelevant, but someone in the job before me thought it was important.

There's also the issue of making tests legible and user-friendly. Two places I tested a few years back, at the Denver Post and through the mail with the Seattle Times, asked for stories that were single-spaced to be edited on paper.

Seattle's test -- retyped and double-spaced after I gave unsolicited feedback -- says Karen Cater, chief of copy desks, originally was a poorly photocopied article straight from the paper, in 9-point type. Imagine squeezing editing marks between those lines.

At the Denver Post, not only were the stories single-spaced, they haven't changed for at least 10 years. "We need a couple of new stories," admits copy desk chief Joe Hudson.

One place I didn't fare well was the Portland (Maine) Press Herald. The testing went on for about 10 hours over two days. One exercise was taking fake reporter's notes and writing a story. I remember being very annoyed because it was not a real-world exercise. The test also seemed to be a hodge-podge of exercises. Sure enough, much of it was collected from other papers, says Bob Dixon, assistant managing editor/copy desk.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Testing Sometimes Flunks


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?