Dramatic Changes in State Legislatures

By Farquhar, Doug | Journal of Environmental Health, April 2009 | Go to article overview

Dramatic Changes in State Legislatures


Farquhar, Doug, Journal of Environmental Health


Like the rest of the nation, state legislatures faced elections in November 2008, shaking the makeup of legislatures across the country. Obama's coattails definitely helped the Democrats, with the party gaining five legislatures to control 27 states, compared to the 14 controlled by the Republican party. The remaining state legislatures are split, with one party controlling the House and the other controlling the Senate.

These wins give Democrats control of 60 of the 99 legislative chambers (each state has a House and Senate, with the exception of Nebraska's unicameral legislature). Republicans control another 37. The Alaska Senate and the Montana House are tied chambers, with an equal number of Democrats and Republicans.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

Factoring in the governors, Democrats control both chambers of the legislature and the governor's seat in 17 states; Republicans have total control in eight states; and 25 states split control between the legislature and governorship (see Figure 1).

[FIGURE 1 OMITTED]

That being said, overall the Democrats did not pick up a huge number of seats as they did in 2006. The seats they did win gave state governments larger Democratic majorities; however, Republicans did extremely well in Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Tennessee. Oklahoma and Tennessee saw--for the first time--Republican control of both legislative chambers. Although both of these states have Democratic governors who were not up for re-election, it has been speculated that if they had been running, both states would have seen full Republican control.

Six states did not have legislative elections in 2008: Alabama, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, and Virginia. In several states, only the House had races or only a limited number of Senate seats were up for election. If senators in Ohio or Michigan, for example, were up for elections this year, it was expected that their Senates would shift from Republican to Democratic control (see Figure 2).

[FIGURE 2 OMITTED]

The big prize for Democrats was winning the New York Senate, which has been under Republican control since 1966. This gave the Democrats complete control in that state. The same holds true in Delaware, where the Democrats took the House to gain control of that state. This gave Democrats control of every east coast legislative chamber north of Virginia, with the exception of the Pennsylvania Senate.

Democrats also took control of the Ohio House, Wisconsin Assembly, and Nevada Senate, and earned a tie in the previously Republican-controlled Alaska Senate, where a coalition of the Democrats and three Republicans joined to select Senator Gary Stevens as the Senate President.

In the South, the GOP made significant gains, with the big wins in Oklahoma and Tennessee. In Tennessee the Republican wins switched control of both the House and Senate. Republicans also won back the Montana Senate, which had gone to the Democrats in 2004.

Texas bucked the trend, to some extent. After seeing Republicans make significant gains, winning control of the governor's office, the Senate, and the House in 2002, Democrats came within one seat of tying the House chamber in 2008. One race was so close that it took almost a month to determine the winner. Had the Democratic candidate won, the House would be split, 75 to 75. Instead, Republicans have a one seat majority, 76 to 74.

Environmental Health Policy in State Legislatures

With all this being said, the impact on state environmental health programs may be minimal. The fiscal gap (the difference between the amount of revenue vs. expenditures) in the states is $84.3 billion. Since no state (except Vermont) is allowed to run a deficit, that means one of three things: massive taxes, massive program cuts, or both. Or the fourth hope, that the $800 billion stimulus package will bail them out.

Regardless of funding, state legislatures have often found ways found ways to promote important issues, and environmental health is one of them, especially chemical reform policy and healthy housing. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Dramatic Changes in State Legislatures
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.