Pentagon Shows Disregard for Budget, Treaties

National Catholic Reporter, September 12, 1997 | Go to article overview

Pentagon Shows Disregard for Budget, Treaties


Two recent reports remind us again exactly who holds sway in government when it comes to getting the lion's share of public money.

The first, called "More Pentagon Follies," was released by Taxpayers for Common Sense, a nonpartisan group that supports fiscal responsibility, and The Council for a Livable World Education Fund, a nonprofit corporation that wants dramatic cuts in defense spending. The report is based largely on news stories and investigations by the U.S. General Accounting Office and the Defense Department's inspector general.

Among other thins it considers payments for corporate restructuring, known in some quarters of Washington as the "money for nothing" policy. "The Department of Defense has been providing large, profitable defense contractors with substantial subsidies since 1993 to cover restructuring costs associated with corporate mergers," says the "Follies" report. So far this year, DOD acknowledges spending at least $817 million for this purpose.

The official explanation: The government wants to encourage companies to become more efficient so that they can build weapons at lower costs. But if the efficiencies to be gained by restructuring are so obvious, it would be reasonable to expect business to do it without government rewards.

A few other Pentagon follies, as detailed in this year's report:

* A third deluxe 18-hole golf course is in the works at Andrews Air Base near Washington. Construction costs have soared to $7 million from the projected $5.1 million. Defense officials say that the golf course is the answer to military morale problems, which can be traced in part to crowded military golf courses. More golf courses also are needed, according to military logic, to repair morale after the damage inflicted by -- you guessed it -- defense cuts!

* Despite all the talk of downsizing and congressional concerns about "official inflation," the Pentagon wants to add dozens of new generals. The Marine Corps, which received a dozen new generals last year, now has a total of 80 generals to oversee 174,000 troops -- one more than it needed to command 475,000 troops in 1945.

* The Pentagon recently completed work on a $5.1 million chapel at a naval training center in San Diego that is scheduled to close this year. This follows a familiar pattern. A 1995 study by the Pentagon found $263 million worth of construction projects at military bases that were either scheduled for closing or had already closed.

* Navy officials, "reliving the glory days of the $435 hammer and the $640 toilet seat," have paid far more money than necessary for various supplies and parts. The Navy paid $127.46 for an aluminum washer, for example, that could have been obtained for $10.50 or less. Nearly $2,000 was spent on a $103 gas bottle.

* The Defense Department has admitted that it simply cannot account for $18 billion. And that appears to be optimistic. The GAO puts the figure at more than $43 billion.

Meanwhile, according to another report, this one from the Natural Resources Defense Council, a recently declassified Department of Energy document contains plans for designing nuclear weapons and simulating nuclear explosions in apparent contradiction of the goals of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Pentagon Shows Disregard for Budget, Treaties
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.