Criminal Law - Statutory Interpretation - Wisconsin Supreme Court Applies Sexual Assault Statute to Attempted Sexual Intercourse with a Corpse

Harvard Law Review, April 2009 | Go to article overview

Criminal Law - Statutory Interpretation - Wisconsin Supreme Court Applies Sexual Assault Statute to Attempted Sexual Intercourse with a Corpse


CRIMINAL LAW--STATUTORY INTERPRETATION--WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT APPLIES SEXUAL ASSAULT STATUTE TO ATTEMPTED SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH A CORPSE.--State v. Grunke, 752 N.W.2d 769 (Wis. 2008).

An overarching principle in criminal law is that legislatures, and not courts, should define the contours of criminal prohibitions. (1) A prominent expression of this principle is the rule of lenity in statutory construction, which requires that judges resolve textual ambiguities in criminal statutes in favor of defendants. (2) The rule tends to promote "values of near-constitutional stature," such as fair notice, controlled discretion, and non-delegation of the definition of criminal conduct. (3) Recently, in State v. Grunke, (4) the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that the state's sexual assault statute (5) unambiguously criminalized sexual intercourse with a corpse even when the defendant did not cause the death of the victim. (6) This application of a criminal statute to conduct that the legislature probably did not intend to criminalize is in tension with the nondelegation principle underlying the rule of lenity. However, because the Grunke court found the text of the statute to be unambiguous, it did not even consider applying the rule of lenity. The rule of lenity should be expanded to allow for the consideration of extratextual evidence of ambiguity in order to ensure that criminal definition is confined to the legislative branch.

On September 2, 2002, Nicholas Grunke, Alexander Grunke, and their friend Dustin Radke attempted to excavate a female corpse at a local cemetery so that Nicholas could engage in sexual intercourse with the corpse. (7) The Grunkes and Radke brought excavation tools, a tarp, and condoms to the cemetery, and proceeded to dig a hole into the body's gravesite. (8) The three men managed to expose the top of the corpse's vault, but fled after being unable to open the vault and hearing another car driving into the cemetery. (9) A police officer subsequently arrived at the cemetery in response to a call reporting a suspicious vehicle on the grounds. (10) The officer encountered Alexander Grunke, noticed his supplies, and placed him in custody. (11)

The Grunkes and Radke were charged in a Wisconsin state court with damage to cemetery property, attempted criminal damage to property, and attempted third-degree sexual assault. (12) The sexual assault statute prohibits "sexual intercourse with a person without the consent of that person." (13) The statute provides, in relevant part, that "'[c]onsent' ... means words or overt actions by a person who is competent to give informed consent indicating a freely given agreement to have sexual intercourse or sexual contact," (14) and establishes a presumption that mentally ill persons (15) or persons "unconscious or for any other reason ... physically unable to communicate unwillingness to an act" (16) are incapable of consent. Finally, section 940.225(7) states that the statute "applies whether a victim is dead or alive at the time of the sexual contact or sexual intercourse." (17)

The trial court dismissed the attempted third-degree sexual assault counts, holding that the sexual assault statute did not criminalize necrophilia. (18) The court of appeals affirmed. (19) The court rejected the prosecution's argument that section 940.225(7) indicates that the statute was intended to cover acts with a corpse even if the defendant had not caused the death of the victim. Although the court admitted that "this argument is appealing on its face," (20) it concluded that "viewing the entire statute in context and in light of its purpose of protecting bodily security, ... the statute is ambiguous." (21) As a result, the court examined the legislative history of the provision. (22) It concluded that the provision was passed as a response to State v. Holt, (23) as indicated by the timing of the amendment and its accompanying drafting comments. (24) In Holt, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals suggested that the prosecutor in a murder-rape case was required to prove that the victim was still alive when the sexual assault took place. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Criminal Law - Statutory Interpretation - Wisconsin Supreme Court Applies Sexual Assault Statute to Attempted Sexual Intercourse with a Corpse
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.