Using a Repeated-Measures Approach to Validating Personality Tests in Small Samples: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Small Businesses

By Bing, Mark N.; Davison, H. Kristl et al. | Journal of Managerial Issues, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Using a Repeated-Measures Approach to Validating Personality Tests in Small Samples: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Small Businesses


Bing, Mark N., Davison, H. Kristl, Arvey, Richard D., Journal of Managerial Issues


In the last 20 years or so, as large businesses have been reducing their workforces, small businesses have contributed substantially to job growth in the United States (Gatewood and Feild, 2001). Additionally, small businesses are becoming increasingly important participants in foreign markets (Darling et al, 1997). The Small Business Administration (2006) noted that small businesses employed roughly half of private sector employees in 2005, and employed individuals and demographic groups who might otherwise have not been employed. Thus, small businesses are making more and more personnel selection decisions, and they are making such decisions without the support and guidance of a large human resources (HR) department.

However, we would assert that small businesses are most in need of ensuring that every HR decision is a good one as they have less "room to maneuver" in response to labor issues in comparison to larger firms (Popkin, 1999: 3). Specifically, in small businesses there is simply less capital, fewer assets, fewer employees, and thus less room for decision errors as the limited resources available are more easily drained in comparison to larger businesses (Klaas et al., 2002). Human resource support in terms of selection, staffing, training, and compensation have all been noted as often lacking in small businesses, and yet are very necessary for reduced employee turnover and small business success (Carlson et al., 2006; Heneman et al., 2000; Hope and Mackin, 2007; Minkus, 2007). For example, unlike large businesses, small businesses cannot afford extensive training programs to provide employees with job-relevant knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs), and thus HR selection is all the more critical to the success of the small business because it needs to hire applicants who already possess job-relevant KSAs. Indeed, small businesses have faced difficulties hiring employees with needed job-specific technical skills and good work habits (Popkin, 1999). Staffing in particular has been identified as an understudied area among small businesses, and researchers have called for additional studies to improve selection practices for small business owners (Heneman et al., 2000). Further, given many small businesses produce limited profits, poor business decisions may have a large effect on the small business's financial bottom line. Thus, in the small business one or two poor hiring decisions may lead to low-quality service and products, resulting in subsequent customer dissatisfaction that could potentially reduce profits to the point at which the small business cannot survive.

Also important is the fact that small businesses with as few as 15 employees are subject to the major equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws (e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964). Given the limited resources of small businesses, a single EEO lawsuit regarding an unlawful selection decision could be sufficient to bankrupt the business. As small businesses are overrepresented in business closures (Small Business Administration, 2005), making accurate and legal selection decisions is one of the most important HR activities for small businesses.

Small businesses also tend to have limited options in terms of practical and defensible selection procedures. Training and experience evaluations, structured interviews, and work sample tests, which rely primarily on content validation strategies, may be feasible for many small businesses (Gatewood and Feild, 2001), but other tests that require large sample sizes for criterion-related validation are often impractical. Small businesses may use existing test batteries or rely on strategies such as validity generalization (Ployhart et al., 2006), but local validation efforts can still be necessary for legal defensibility. Also, small businesses are unlikely to obtain statistical significance via criterion-related validation because of their small sample sizes and the resulting loss of statistical power.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Using a Repeated-Measures Approach to Validating Personality Tests in Small Samples: A Feasibility Study with Implications for Small Businesses
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?