A Question of Freedom: African Americans and Ghanaian Independence

By Davidson, Roger A., Jr. | Negro History Bulletin, July-September 1997 | Go to article overview

A Question of Freedom: African Americans and Ghanaian Independence


Davidson, Roger A., Jr., Negro History Bulletin


Between the cold war years of 1957 and 1961, the specter of independence in British West Africa, specifically Ghana, caught the attention of the world. These latter years of Dwight D. Eisenhower's presidency also marked increased African American activism in the struggle for civil rights in the United States. During this period, the primary goal of United States foreign policy was the global containment of communism. In Africa, the United States sought to exploit friendly relations with Ghana and Ghanaian independence as a means to extend American influence throughout the continent. In contrast, African Americans viewed Ghanaian independence as a strike for freedom and equality. Accordingly, African Americans became acutely interested in Ghana in the months preceding and following March 6, 1957, independence ceremonies. Ghana became intricately entwined with the civil rights struggle, and grew from a reaffirmation of racial ties to an ancestral homeland. Many African Americans hoped that Ghanaian independence could help them to obtain freedom in America, or if necessary, allow them to gain access to a freer life in an independent black African country.(1)

Though global in intent, the American commitment to containment focused more on Europe than Asia, Africa, or Latin America. In pre-independence Africa, the United States dealt with the colonial metropoles in matters regarding the cold war. The decolonization of British West Africa forced the United States government to cultivate diplomatic ties with the sub-Saharan countries to gain independence. The Eisenhower administration viewed an independent Ghana and its prime minister, American educated Kwame Nkrumah, as vital ingredients to combat communism in Africa and to help influence other nationalist African leaders to ally with the Western powers. The importance of Nkrumah and Ghana was also apparent to African Americans who viewed the independent black African country with reverence and pride. For them, Ghana became a symbol of freedom during a time of black American civil unrest and white backlash.(2)

Since few African Americans held politically influential posts during this period, their primary outlet for political opinions was the African American press--the United Negro Press (UNP)--and the black newspapers that thrived in almost every American city. These newspapers served as the sounding posts for black opinions and provided a system of global information for African Americans, who used the black press as a means to stay abreast of worldwide developments that affected Africa and the diaspora. The black press also provided an outlet for black sentiments on global issues, and during the period, Ghana and Kwame Nkrumah shared front page coverage with racial violence in the South and Martin Luther King, Jr. The detailed coverage of independence in Africa analyzed the impact of cold war issues on Untied States foreign policy toward Ghana and the impact of Ghana on the civil rights struggle in the United States.(3)

Though official government records and correspondence did not reflect the concerns and direct opinions of African Americans on independence in West Africa, they provided an accurate assessment of the government's position on cold war policy towards African self-determination. Since Soviet influence in sub-Saharan Africa remained low, the State Department focused on preventing communist infiltration by courting various African liberation interests. This led to the paradoxical policy of espousing self-determination and decolonization while supporting the European colonial powers. In a 1955 Office of African Affairs memorandum, American officials found the decolonization issue difficult to handle. They did not want to "adopt courses of action which would directly undermine the Metropolitan powers" nor could they "afford to ignore the aspirations of Africans." In short, the officials believed that the colonial possessions were important to the economies of the Metropolitan powers, but also realized that supporting self-determination in Africa both thwarted the communist threat and provided access to Africa's raw materials. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Question of Freedom: African Americans and Ghanaian Independence
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.