Kids Have First Amendment Rights, Too

By Peck, Robert S.; Symons, Ann K. | American Libraries, September 1997 | Go to article overview

Kids Have First Amendment Rights, Too


Peck, Robert S., Symons, Ann K., American Libraries


TWO INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM FIGHTERS CLARIFY WHAT THE "BIRTH CERTIFICATE FOR THE INTERNET" MEANS FOR LIBRARIANS AND MINORS AS THE SCHOOL YEAR BEGINS

In striking down the purpotedly Internet-purifying Communications Decency Act (CDA), the U.S. Supreme Court held that First Amendment principles apply with undiminished vitality in the vast, uninhibited expanses of cyberspace. Likening electronic conversations to those of a town crier with an enhanced audience and transmitted text and images to Revolutionary-era pamphlets, the Court's opinion enunciated an expansive view of free speech for the 21st century that was rooted in its 18th-century textual origins.

ALA and Freedom to Read Foundation lawyer Bruce Ennis, who argued the case before the Supreme Court, called the decision the "birth certificate for the Internet." The High Court's decision guarantees that speech on the Internet receives the highest level of constitutional protection available, equal to that afforded to newspapers and books and not the more limited free-speech protection granted to broadcasters.

Some answers to Internet problems skirt around fights

While the Court's decision definitively resolved the freespeech status of "indecent" and "patently offensive" electronic expression, many people, quite naturally, continue to be concerned about the exposure of young children to the Internet's most untamed frontiers, from sexually explicit material to violence to "politically incorrect" speech. President Clinton announced that he wants to encourage efforts to develop a "V-chip" for the Internet. The U.S. Congress and the states have begun to explore more narrowly drafted legislation. And librarians already are confronting demands that software filters be installed on Internet access terminals.

Certainly, some of these "solutions" to perceived problems suffer the same defects that led the Supreme Court to invalidate the CDA - that is, they seek to ban material protected by the First Amendment for both children and adults. What is too often lost in these discussions is that children have First Amendment rights, too. That fact has important implications for libraries that should not be overlooked.

Some First Amendment basics

It is important to begin with some First Amendment basics:

* Obscenity was and is illegal without the CDA. Obscenity is a very narrow category of expression that the Supreme Court has said largely falls outside the First Amendment's protection.

* Sexual expression, including nudity, that is merely indecent remains within First Amendment protection.

* "Harmful to minors," another category, is essentially an obscenity standard using youngsters as the relevant yardstick. To be harmful to minors, speech must therefore be prurient, patently offensive, and without value for minors. Material that has substantial value for a significant minority of 17-year-olds cannot be considered harmful to minors. Thus, this category covers only a very narrow span of material. Forty-eight states have harmful-to-minors laws, many with exemptions for public libraries.

Existing state laws supersede librarians' judgments

Internet expression that falls within the standards of obscenity and harmful-to-minors is already made illegal by existing criminal laws aimed at the producers and distributors of those forms of expression. Deeming material obscene or harmful to minors requires both specific state laws that define the illegal material and neutral due-process hearings - something that librarians cannot substitute their judgment for.

Even though the government has a legitimate interest in protecting younger children from certain harmful materials, the CDA case reminds us that there are substantial limitations on the way in which those government interests are pursued. Government actions in this area must accommodate the rights of children to receive a wide variety of materials, the rights of parents who wish their children to have access to such material, and the rights of adults to use the Internet for indisputably mature materials. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Kids Have First Amendment Rights, Too
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.