Muslim Democrats in Turkey and Egypt: Participatory Politics as a Catalyst

By Yilmaz, Ihsan | Insight Turkey, April 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Muslim Democrats in Turkey and Egypt: Participatory Politics as a Catalyst

Yilmaz, Ihsan, Insight Turkey

Even though there is no simple causal relationship between the lack of democracy and political extremism, it has been argued that institutional exclusion from the political process and indiscriminate repression make extremist groups inclined to adopt revolutionary (1) or even worse terrorist methods. Conversely, political participation (even in semi-democratic autocracies) encourages radical groups to pursue their objectives through peaceful means. Political pluralism, albeit in a limited form, can induce radical and even antisystemic parties to moderate their political discourses. (2)

This paper analyses how and to what extent the processes of exclusion and/or inclusion policies of the regimes, general framework of political and legal structures, politico-legal constraints and opportunities in Turkey and Egypt have influenced the transformation and moderation of Islamisms toward a pluralist discourse in these two countries. Instead of focusing only on the Islamist discourse, the interaction of discourse, context, structure and practice will be examined. (3)

Islamist parties in Turkey were successively banned from politics, but reemerged after reframing their discourse in response to their perceived opportunities and constraints. The current Justice and Development Party (AK Party) has gone a step further than its Islamist predecessors, dramatically highlighting a process of institutional change and ideological moderation. The increasing moderation of the Islamist movement is the result of several institutional factors. (4) The Turkish Islamists have been given the political freedom in a liberalized autocracy (5) to make strategic choices in a political system that rewards political participation with credible opportunities for power, while at the same time, the state and civil society have imposed public institutional constraints on the Islamists in addition to the interactions taking place between Islamists, their constituency and the state. (6) Similar developments have also been taking place in a different context, Egypt. After analyzing the evolution of Turkish Islamists to Muslim democrats, the paper will look at the same issue in the Egyptian context.

Evolution of Islamism in Turkey

When the Turkish Republic decided to close down all Sufi brotherhoods and lodges, as a result of the Sunni Hanafi understanding of preferring the worst state to anarchy, chaos and revolution they did not challenge the state. Nevertheless, they continued their existence invisibly and unofficially, without claiming any public or official role. In return, the officials turned a blind eye to their existence. Among them, the Nakhsbandi order has played an important role, for all prominent Turkish Islamist parties have originated in the Nakhsbandi brotherhood. (7) The Khalidi branch of the Nakhsbandi has been the most politically active brotherhood. Its sheikh, Mehmed Zahid Kotku (1897-1980), preached that it was the duty of observant Muslims to take an active interest in national affairs. (8) He did not perceive the secular state as an absolute enemy. He created a new "operational code" of the brotherhood, synchronized with the political code promoted by the secular state, that of constitutional legitimacy. By the 1970s, Kotku started promoting a second layer of legitimacy, working in tandem with Islamic legitimacy, which was that of political institution building. (9)

Kotku's disciple Professor Necmettin Erbakan and his followers have successively established the National Order (Jan. 26, 1970 to Jan. 14, 1971), National Salvation (Oct. 11, 1972 to Sept. 12, 1980), Welfare (July 19, 1983 to Jan. 16, 1998), Virtue (Dec. 17, 1997 to June 22, 2001) and Felicity parties (July 20, 2001 to present). With the exception of the existing Felicity Party (SP), all the others were shut down by the establishment. The first prominent Islamist party in republican Turkey, the National Order Party (MNP) and the National Salvation Party (MSP) were established through Sheikh Kotku's promotion and support, and he had supervised their activities.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Muslim Democrats in Turkey and Egypt: Participatory Politics as a Catalyst


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?