In Defense of Filtering

By Burt, David | American Libraries, August 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

In Defense of Filtering


Burt, David, American Libraries


RESPONSES TO 10 ARGUMENTS AGAINST THE USE OF INTERNET FILTERS IN LIBRARIES

We have all heard about the dangers of Internet filtering software packages from the antifiltering activists. But even in a unanimous Supreme Court decision calling the Communications Decency Act unconstitutional (see p. 11, this issue), the justices left open the question of the appropriateness of filtering children's access in libraries. The antifiltering arguments are often full of distortions, half-truths, and poor logic. What follows are responses to the 10 most common arguments against filters.

Argument 1: All filters rely on keyword blocking. Filters block out all sites that contain words like "breast," thereby blocking out all information about breast cancer.

It's true that all filters have keyword blocking. But those who oppose filtering often leave out a key fact when they make this argument: The better filtering products allow you to turn the keyword blocking off. Every library that filters that I know of turns off the keyword blocking and instead relies on site-selected blocking, which involves a preselected stop list of banned sites chosen by employees of the software company.

Argument 2: Filters routinely block sites relating to sex education, AIDS information, gay rights, and abortion.

It's true that most filters do block some of these things. But here again another key fact is left out: The better filters break down banned sites by subject. Cyber Patrol, for example has about a dozen categories such as "controversial," "sex education," and "full nudity." When set up so that only pornographic sites are blocked, it does a good, though not perfect, job of blocking out only pornography. And the better filters, like Cyber Patrol, allow you to unblock a site that has been incorrectly blocked. The selection of blocked sites is not perfect, but it is rapidly improving.

Argument 3: Filtering involves turning over the selection of materials to outsiders.

Yes, this is true, but it's also nothing new to libraries either. Librarians have relied on vendors to preselect for them for years. Buying books on an approval plan or 300 full-text magazines on a CD-ROM also involves letting a vendor do a certain amount of selection for the librarian. There's nothing wrong with that.

Argument 4: Filters rely on a secret stop list of banned sites that can't be viewed or changed.

This is a complicated topic since the different filters handle this differently. Net Nanny, for example, allows you to view the stop list and to change it. Cyber Patrol allows you to change the stop list but not to view it. The vendor's reluctance to publish their stop list is understandable: It's what really makes the software valuable, and the vendor is naturally reluctant to give this information away to competitors. It is preferable that a filter's stop list be viewable, but a stop list that is editable and reasonably accurate is acceptable as well.

Argument 5: By filtering, a library can be viewed as a "publisher" of a Web site and could then be held responsible for its content. Prodigy was found liable for this reason in a court case.

True, Prodigy was found liable in a court case because they exercised some editorial control over the material they "published." The antifiltering activists love to cite this example but they somehow always seem to forget to mention the Cox-Wyden amendment to the Communications Act. The Cox-Wyden amendment establishes protection for "Good Samaritan" blocking and screening of offensive material. Specifically, the bill establishes that no provider or user of interactive computer services will be held liable for: 1) actions taken voluntarily in good faith to restrict access to material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable; or 2) actions taken to provide the technical means to restrict access to such material.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

In Defense of Filtering
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?