Informed Democratic Consent? the Case of the Icelandic Database

By Arnason, Vilhjalmur; Arnason, Gardar | Trames, March-June 2004 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Informed Democratic Consent? the Case of the Icelandic Database

Arnason, Vilhjalmur, Arnason, Gardar, Trames

1. Introduction

The following discussion is about plans currently being carried out in Iceland to create a single health sector database for the whole nation, intended in part for research in human genomics and genetic epidemiology. The rapid rise of genetics and the unprecedented tensions between public and commercial interests in this type of scientific research create new problems and magnify old ones concerning the role of government in defending public interests and the efficacy of democratic procedures in securing such ethical requirements as privacy and confidentiality of medical records and genetic material. The question of democratic consent will be of particular interest: We are not concerned with the question of whether community consent is at all possible (1), but we argue that the debate about the Health Sector Database (HSD) in Iceland does not exemplify well community consent, and that the procedure through which the HSD was made possible was seriously flawed.

The Health Sector Database will contain information gathered from medical records and it will be linked with two other databases, one containing genealogical data for every Icelander alive and, going centuries back, most of those deceased, and the other containing genetic information. A private company, deCODE genetics, (2) has been granted exclusive rights for 12 years to construct the database, maintain it and sell access to the information.

We shall first, in subsection 2, briefly describe the database project and some of the main ethical issues involved. In subsection 3 we discuss democratic community consent in the context of the Icelandic HSD debate. In subsection 4 we analyse the political procedures and the debate, which led to a controversial bill being passed by the Icelandic parliament on December 17th 1998. The bill contained the changes to Icelandic laws required for the HSD project to go ahead. We conclude that informed democratic consent has to meet both procedural and substantive criteria, and that in this case it failed on both accounts.

2. The Icelandic Health Sector Database

The Health Sector Database will contain information taken from medical records in Iceland. The data gathered for the database includes most medically relevant data that are codable, such as symptoms, test results, diagnosis, stage and duration of disease, medication, treatment, results, side-effects and cost of treatment, who provides treatment, where and for how long, and some personal information, such as the patient's age group. Patients' narratives will not be included, nor personal information that is not medically relevant. It is not clear whether information about diet, life-style (other than smoking and drinking habits), sexual orientation, race, vocation or income bracket will be included, all of which can be medically relevant. (3)

The database laws, as they were approved by the parliament, make clear that the Health Sector Database may only include data from medical records, but it can be linked with other databases containing genealogical and genetic data (with the approval of the Data Protection Commission). These two types of data are at opposite ends with regard to sensitivity and privacy. Genealogical information is considered public information in Iceland, no privacy restrictions apply to it and it is frequently published in books and newspapers. In order to keep individuals unidentifiable, genealogical information will only appear in query results from the database as degree of kinship, not as family trees. Genetic data, however, are considered as private in Iceland as in other Western countries and, according to ethical codes established by deCODE itself, they will only be entered in the database if the individual has given his or her explicit consent. (4)

There are two worries here concerning the handling of genetic data. One is the claim that no one can give informed consent for providing genetic data for the database as there are no specific research plans available.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Informed Democratic Consent? the Case of the Icelandic Database


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?