Bill Clinton's New World Order Takes Shape

By Fretz, Lewis | New Zealand International Review, November-December 1997 | Go to article overview

Bill Clinton's New World Order Takes Shape


Fretz, Lewis, New Zealand International Review


Lewis Fretz predicts success for President Clinton's quest for a grand confederation of Western democracies.

Six years have elapsed since Soviet-style communism died in its bed and the Soviet Union itself became history. The Cold War ended sometime between the collapse of the Soviet empire in Eastern Europe during 1989 and President Boris Yeltsin's dissolution of the Soviet Union during 1991. Since the end of the Cold War, politicians and scholars have sought to make sense out of the post-Cold War international order and to hazard some predictions about the direction in which the international community is heading as we prepare to enter the 21st century.

At this particular historical moment, the l United States is the key to whatever new international order will emerge or fail to emerge. In a recent issue of Time, Charles Krauthammer summarises the reasons for America's current pre-eminent position in today's world:

By every measure, the extent of America's dominance astonishes. Militarily, there has never in the past thousand years been a greater gap between the No. 1 world power and the No. 2. Not even the British Empire at its height displayed the superiority shown by American arms today. Economically? The American economy is more than twice the size of its nearest competitor. We enjoy, almost uniquely, low inflation, low unemployment and vigorous growth. Culturally? ... There has been mass culture. But there has never before been mass world culture. Now one is emerging, and it is distinctly American .... Diplomatically? Nothing of significance gets done without us. True, we are not interested in doing terribly much except enjoying our success and getting even richer. But that just makes the point. Until the Americans arrive in Bosnia, the war drags on. When America takes to the sidelines in the Middle East, nothing moves. We decide if NATO expands and who gets in. And where we decide not to decide, as in Cambodia--often held up as an example of how the U.N. and regional powers can settle local conflicts without the U.S.--all hell breaks loose. All right then. We all . . . agree on the premise: the bipolar world of the cold war begat not, as predicted, a multipolar world but a unipolar one with the U.S. standing alone at its apex.(1)

Three types

According to Joseph Nye, a pre-eminent United States will face three types of conflicts in the future--great power conflicts, major regional conflicts, and communal conflicts in peripheral states. Great power conflicts are the least likely because nuclear weapons are involved; however, they are not unthinkable, as conflict could still occur at the conventional level. Major regional conflicts, especially in the Middle East and East Asia, are far more likely to occur, as regional powers seek to become regional hegemons by either challenging the United States or challenging one another. Communal conflicts in peripheral states, located predominantly in the developing world, will be the most common problem facing the United States and its allies as they seek to maintain order and stability in a world where the law of the jungle still counts for more than the rule of law. Nye concludes his analysis with these words:

Leadership by the United States, as the world's leading economy, its most powerful military force, and a leading democracy, is a key factor in limiting the frequency and destructiveness of great power, regional, and communal conflicts. The paradox of the post-cold war role of the United States is that it is the most powerful state in terms of both 'herd' power resources (its economy and military forces) end 'soft' ones (the appeal of its political system and culture), yet it is not so powerful that it can achieve all its international goals by acting alone ....The U.S. role will thus not be that of a lone global policeman; rather, the United States can frequently serve as the sheriff of the posse, leading shifting coalitions of friends and allies to address shared security concerns within the legitimizing framework of international organizations. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Bill Clinton's New World Order Takes Shape
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.