The Future of US-India Nuclear Co-Operation: Sagarika Dutt Suggests That the October 2008 'Deal' Has Strengthened the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime

By Dutt, Sagarika | New Zealand International Review, May-June 2009 | Go to article overview

The Future of US-India Nuclear Co-Operation: Sagarika Dutt Suggests That the October 2008 'Deal' Has Strengthened the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime


Dutt, Sagarika, New Zealand International Review


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

On 10 October 2008, India and the United States signed the 123 Agreement for co-operation between the two countries in the field of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, a few days after President Bush had signed the deal into law in the United States. (1) This was the culmination of a process that began over three years ago and gave rise to intense diplomatic and political debate. The agreement will allow India access to nuclear reactors, fuel and technologies from the United States after a gap of 34 years. Washington had terminated nuclear co-operation with India back in 1974 after New Delhi had conducted a nuclear test in the Pokhran desert in Rajasthan. It makes India the only country in the world able to pursue civil nuclear trade with other willing nations even though it has not signed the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1968. This article explains how this 'deal' has affected domestic politics in India and argues that the issue is not just about promoting strategic co-operation between the United States and India but is also about strengthening the nuclear non-proliferation regime.

India has not signed the NPT and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) but has declared a voluntary moratorium on nuclear testing. India's nuclear programme started in the 1960s. It conducted nuclear tests in 1974 and 1998 which prompted Western countries, including the United States, to impose sanctions on it. Because of India's 'pariah' status for not signing these treaties its nuclear power programme has developed largely without fuel or technological assistance from other countries. India's nuclear energy self-sufficiency extended from uranium exploration and mining through fuel fabrication, heavy water production, reactor design and construction, to reprocessing and waste management. Nuclear power supplied around 3 per cent of India's electricity in 2007-08, and it is envisaged that this will increase to 25 per cent by 2050 as imported uranium becomes available and new plants come on line. India is also developing technology to utilise its abundant reserves of thorium. It is estimated that India has 290,000 tonnes of thorium reserves, which is about one-quarter of the world's total reserves. (2)

Joint statement

Co-operation between the United States and India in the field of civilian nuclear energy has been a controversial issue right from the start. Building on the Next Steps in Strategic Partnership (NSSP), a process started by the BJP government, India's present Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, and President George Bush released a joint statement dated 18 July 2005. They asserted that 'as leaders of nations committed to the values of human freedom, democracy and the rule of law, the new relationship between India and the United States will promote stability, democracy, prosperity and peace throughout the world'. This sweeping statement is followed by a further emphasis on their 'common values and interests', which will form the basis of efforts 'to create an international environment conducive to [the] promotion of democratic values' and 'to combat terrorism relentlessly'. The statement then gives a list of fields in which the two countries will co-operate. They are the economy; energy and the environment; democracy and development; non-proliferation and security; and high technology and space?

A key action point is to 'support and accelerate economic growth in both countries through greater trade, investment and technolog[ical] collaboration'. In the field of energy and the environment, the statement made it clear that the US--India Energy Dialogue would address issues such as energy security and sustainable development. The two leaders agreed on the need 'to promote the imperatives of development and safeguarding the environment' and 'commit to developing and deploying cleaner, more efficient, affordable and diversified energy technologies'.

Discussions between Bush and Singh also addressed the issue of non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and Bush expressed the opinion that 'as a responsible state with advanced nuclear technology, India should acquire the same benefits and advantages as other such states'. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

The Future of US-India Nuclear Co-Operation: Sagarika Dutt Suggests That the October 2008 'Deal' Has Strengthened the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.