Boundary Issues: Disputes over Territorial Boundaries Have a Habit of Turning Ugly. and When They Do, Governments Are Increasingly Turning to the Geographers at the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University for Advice. Olivia Edward Meets the Men and Women Who Know Where to Draw the Line

By Edward, Olivia | Geographical, May 2009 | Go to article overview

Boundary Issues: Disputes over Territorial Boundaries Have a Habit of Turning Ugly. and When They Do, Governments Are Increasingly Turning to the Geographers at the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University for Advice. Olivia Edward Meets the Men and Women Who Know Where to Draw the Line


Edward, Olivia, Geographical


[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

I'd rather not talk about that ... Maybe we could leave that bit out ... I'm not sure I should say anything more on that subject ... Off the record I could say ...'

Interviewing Martin Pratt is a rather difficult task. As head of the International Boundaries Research Unit (IBRU), he advises on border disputes around the world, and consequently, much of his work is top secret.

The IBRU, the world's first boundary study centre, was established at Durham University's geography department in 1989, and is now a self-funded business that advises everyone 'who bumps into a boundary and realises they don't know much about it'.

'I often say we have one foot in academia and one foot in the real world,' says Pratt, who spends half his time in the UK and the other half overseas running training courses or using his geographical and archival knowledge to advise clients ranging from oil companies to NGOs and governments.

With its work often taking in some of the most heated disputes on the planet, including many in Africa and the ongoing conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, one might expect the IBRU offices to be littered with flak jackets and snapshots of staff smiling beside guerrilla leaders, not to mention a general air of derring-do hanging in the hallways. But Pratt laughs at the suggestion. 'We try to avoid the danger,' he says. 'We tend to get parachuted in as experts. Meetings tend to be at quite a senior level in a comfortable environment.' Indeed, the office--where five fulltime staff work--is rather ordinary, with just the odd exotic item, such as a large dried Sudanese gourd, and the occasional foreign map hinting at the overseas work they do.

Much of this work focuses on pinpointing the location of a boundary ('the line of no thickness where one state ends and another begins', explains IBRU research associate John Donaldson, compared to 'borders', which can be either a line or a region). And that isn't always as simple as it sounds. 'We talk about boundary recovery,' says Pratt. This process can range from interviewing villagers on the Cameroon-Nigeria frontier about where they thought the boundary was located to trawling through thousands of documents in UK archives in connection with disputed islands off Borneo. 'It's a sort of detective work, piecing together evidence and trying to build up the most accurate picture we can.'

INADEQUATE DEFINITION

'Most boundary disputes tend to be based on the fact that the original boundary was inadequately defined,' says Pratt, citing as an example the armistice line in the Israel--Palestine conflict, which was literally the line between the two warring sides when they stopped fighting in 1948, but is now the basis for any future peace settlements.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

'In Jerusalem, it was drawn on the hood of a Jeep, in the middle of a gun battle, while the two commanders were ducking bullets,' says Pratt. 'They used a grease pencil (a sort of crayon), which meant that when the lines were translated onto a large-scale map, they were up to 30 metres wide. So, immediately, people were asking where the actual line was supposed to be. And the Israel-Palestine conflict being what it is, they then spent the next 30 years arguing about it.'

Computers have made newer boundaries more accurate, but these sometimes clash with the paper-drawn lines. 'There's a great story about the continental shelf boundary between the UK and Norway,' says Pratt. 'It was agreed in two parts. One was in 1965 using paper charts and the second half was in 1978 using mathematical algorithms. And at the point where they were supposed to meet, there was a gap of about 331 metres.' Almost inevitably, that gap contained an oil field. 'It's sometimes said that the UK lost hundreds of millions of pounds because of that "error".'

New visualisation techniques have also helped countries agree on new borders.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Boundary Issues: Disputes over Territorial Boundaries Have a Habit of Turning Ugly. and When They Do, Governments Are Increasingly Turning to the Geographers at the International Boundaries Research Unit at Durham University for Advice. Olivia Edward Meets the Men and Women Who Know Where to Draw the Line
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.