Taking from A and Giving to B: Substantive Due Process and the Case of the Shifting Paradigm

By Orth, John V. | Constitutional Commentary, Summer 1997 | Go to article overview

Taking from A and Giving to B: Substantive Due Process and the Case of the Shifting Paradigm


Orth, John V., Constitutional Commentary


The Fifth Amendment prohibits the federal government from depriving any person of "life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," and the Fourteenth Amendment extends that prohibition to the states. State constitutions say the same thing, in one form of words or another.(1) Scholars have traced the phrase "due process of law" to Sir E4ward Coke's seventeenth century commentary on Magna Carta,(2) in which he used the words, claiming a Law French original,(3) to restate (and perhaps enlarge) the Great Charter's guarantee of freemen's rights against governmental invasion except per legem terre ("by the law of the land").(4) It Should be unnecessary to remark that a guarantee of due process is a procedural guarantee. Before a person can be deprived of life, liberty, or property, certain procedures must be observed, procedures designed to ensure fairness.(5) In its English origin, insistence on due process of law -- or the law of the land -- was designed to protect against executive (or judicial) overreaching.

Six hundred and fifty years after Magna Carta, in the last decades of the nineteenth century, due process in America had become a constitutional limitation on legislative power. No longer exclusively concerned with how the executive (or judiciary) proceeded, due process developed a concern with what the legislature did. Due process had acquired, in other words, a substantive dimension. United States Supreme Court Justice Samuel Miller had the historical perspective to recognize the contrast. In Davidson v. New Orleans(6) in 1878 he wrote on behalf of the Court:

It is easy to see that when the great barons of England wrung

from King John, at the point of the sword, the concession that

neither their lives nor their property should be disposed of by

the crown, except as provided by the law of the land, they

meant by "law of the land" the ancient and customary laws of

the English people, or laws enacted by the Parliament of

which those barons were a controlling element. It was not in

their minds, therefore, to protect themselves against the

enactment of laws by the Parliament of England.(7)

But, he continued, the Fourteenth Amendment directed attention to state action. "[C]an a State make anything due process of law which, by its own legislation, it chooses to declare such?"(8) he asked rhetorically, and answered on behalf of his brethren:

To affirm this is to hold that the prohibition to the States is of

no avail, or has no application where the invasion of private

rights is effected under the forms of State legislation. It seems

to us that a statute which declares in terms, and without more,

that the full and exclusive title of a described piece of land,

which is now in A, shall be and is hereby vested in B, would, if

effectual, deprive A of his property without due process of

law, within the meaning of the constitutional provision.(9)

Taking from A and giving to B had become the shorthand to describe what substantive due process was designed to prevent.

A similar case of taking from A and giving to B had been hypothesized nearly fifty years earlier by Justice Joseph Story in Wilkinson v. Leland(10) in 1829. In the actual facts of that case, the state of Rhode Island had attempted by statute to confirm title to Rhode Island real estate. The property had been sold by an executrix of an insolvent New Hampshire testator pursuant to authority granted by a New Hampshire probate court. Because the United States Supreme Court held that the title was valid without regard to the legislation, it did not need to decide the question of the constitutionality of the statute. In extensive dicta, however, Justice Story examined the issue nonetheless. Today, perhaps, the question would seem to be one of attempted legislative revision of a final judicial decision, a violation of separation of powers. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Taking from A and Giving to B: Substantive Due Process and the Case of the Shifting Paradigm
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.