Going beyond the Politics of Bisexuality

By Burr, Chandler | The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine), October 14, 1997 | Go to article overview

Going beyond the Politics of Bisexuality


Burr, Chandler, The Advocate (The national gay & lesbian newsmagazine)


Time heals all wounds, and the battle over bisexuality, so fierce in the late 20th century, has faded during the past 30 years. "Bisexuality exists!" and "We're all really bisexual!" were battle cries of the past. We look back from 2027 and wonder what we were fighting over.

What we were fighting over was politics. The battle wasn't really about bisexuality at all. It was about the way we viewed human beings and human potential. Bisexuality was symbol, and it was principle. But the belief in bisexuality was also empirically testable, and that is where we began fighting with one another in earnest.

In the last decade of the last century, serious clinical and biological research into sexual orientation began for the first time in human history. Scientists, wondering if there were genes that created an instinctual attraction to one gender or the other or both, asked thousands and thousands of people about the way they experienced their sexual orientation. As biologists they weren't interested in how culture shapes this instinct, how society makes us view it, and how religion makes us interpret it. They were interested only in the instinct itself, that uncontrollable, unbidden flash of desire.

What they found was that sexual orientation, like another trait called human handedness, was essentially "bimodal." Both traits had instinctual, unchosen majority orientations (right-handedness and heterosexuality), and both had minority orientations (left-handedness and homosexuality). And both had much smaller orientations (ambidexterity and bisexuality). Virtually no men were bisexual; bisexuality was almost exclusively a phenomenon found in women, and in most of them it was instinctual, unchosen, as well. And the data was quite clear and consistent on this.

Now you, of course, from your perspective well into the 21st century, find this unremarkable. For you, the fact that most people are born straight; that a much, much smaller percentage are born gay; and that the smallest percentage of all are born bisexual (and almost all of those women) is just ... well, it's about as surprising as the distribution data of handedness. But it didn't used to be like that.

And the reason was, as I've said, politics. Politically, the Right and Left, now as then as 400 years ago and since the beginning of the modern age, have fought over the Question of Human Nature: Why are we human beings what we are? The two competing answers, the answers on which all policy prescriptions are based, are: Born or Made.

"Born," said the ultraconservative Victorian social Darwinists (citing Hobbes and Descartes), and so they told the lower classes to stay in their places because they were born to them, women to accept a secondary role that was natural, nonwhites that nature had made them the colonized. They saw an inherent, biological inequality among people.

"Made," said the ultraliberal Marxists (citing Locke and Rousseau), and so they held that if only we could change the society that made us--nationalize production, educate the masses, equalize environments--we could create equality among people. Since people were made, they would reflect their environment, and there was always a potential social equality among people.

This debate was very much alive in 1997. It surfaced every time someone on the Left proposed a social program (and higher taxes to pay for it) and someone on the Right opposed it. And so what did the research say--Born or Made? Into whose arsenal did it slip like a slim, potent little weapon?

It was a weapon in the armamentarium of the conservatives. A growing body of biological research said: Born. It said: The conservatives are right. …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Going beyond the Politics of Bisexuality
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.