American Exceptionalism, the War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World

By Strossen, Nadine | Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

American Exceptionalism, the War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World

Strossen, Nadine, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy

When some New York Law School students first decided to organize a Federalist Society chapter many years ago, they actually asked me to be their faculty advisor. Some will say that this shows how hard it is to find a conservative law professor. But what it really shows is that these New York Law School students were honoring this organization's libertarian founding principles. Those principles are reflected in the opening words of the Federalist Society's mission statement: "The Federalist Society ... is founded on the principle[] that the state exists to preserve freedom.... The Society seeks ... [to reorder] priorities within the legal system to place a premium on individual liberty...." (1) Also relevant to this Essay's topic, the mission statement declares that "the separation of governmental powers is central to our Constitution." (2) Unfortunately, the "War on Terror" (3) has violated these fundamental precepts of the Federalist Society in numerous ways, with devastating consequences for liberty, democracy, and national security alike.

For details, refer to the website of a certain organization that has been promoting the libertarian aspect of the Federalist Society's agenda for almost ninety years now. The American Civil Liberties Union has been working closely with many national security experts and other diverse allies in our campaign to keep our great country both "Safe and Free." (4)

In contrast, many post-9/11 measures have been the worst of both worlds: They undermine human rights, both at home and around the world, and they do not help the United States counter terrorism. Lifelong military and intelligence officials have said that a fatal flaw in the "War on Terror" is that the United States is losing the moral authority and credibility that is essential in a war of ideas and values.

Let me cite just two examples. General Charles Krulak, Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps, and Joseph Hoar, a former Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central Command, recently wrote:

   This war will be won or lost not on the battlefield but in the
   minds of potential supporters who have not yet thrown in their
   lot with the enemy. If we forfeit our values by signaling that
   they are negotiable in situations of grave or imminent danger,
   we drive those undecideds into the arms of the enemy. This
   way lies defeat, and we are well down the road to it. (5)

These two military leaders strongly denounced, among other policies, secret CIA interrogation programs that use "torture techniques euphemistically called 'water-boarding,' 'sensory deprivation,' 'sleep deprivation' and 'stress positions'--conduct we used to call war crimes." (6) As we learned in October 2007, the Justice Department has continued to use secret memos to authorize painful physical and psychological tactics, (7) carrying out policies that had already triggered courageous internal criticism by even committed conservative Republicans who otherwise support the Administration's policies, including Professor Jack Goldsmith. (8) This is just the latest in a series of revelations about various secret programs allegedly justified by President Bush's apparently limitless conception of his "Commander-in-Chief" power. (9)

Let me remind you of some earlier revelations in this vein, about which we learned thanks to intrepid investigative reporters and courageous and principled whistleblowers inside the government and military. The earlier revelations include the CIA secretly detaining and "rendering" prisoners to countries where they were tortured; (10) the FBI and Department of Defense spying on individuals and groups who were peacefully expressing their views on issues including the war in Iraq, the environment, and animals' rights; (11) the misuse of the intrusive National Security Letter power, as critiqued by the Justice Department's own Inspector General; (12) and the National Security Agency's surveillance of the phone and online communications of innocent American citizens right here in the United States without court-approved warrants.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Cite this article

Cited article

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

American Exceptionalism, the War on Terror, and the Rule of Law in the Islamic World


Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?