Neutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought

By Breen, John M. | Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

Neutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought


Breen, John M., Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy


INTRODUCTION
I. FOUR KINDS OF LIBERAL NEUTRALITY
II. FOUR COMMITMENTS IN CATHOLIC
    SOCIAL THOUGHT
    A. The Status of Rights in Catholic
       Social Thought
       1. Rights as Less than Absolute
       2. Rights and Duties
       3. The Good and the Right
          Reconsidered
          a. The Untenable Nature of
             Complete Neutrality
          b. The Common Good as the
             Norm of Social Life
          c. The Nature of the Right and the
             Priority of the Good
       4. The Civilization of Love: The Goal of
          Social Life
          a. The Central Importance
             of the Family
          b. The Liberal "Goal" of Social Life:
             Pluralism and the Civilization of
             Tolerance
    B. A Realist Anthropology
       1. The Human Person: Freedom
          and Intellect
       2. Love: The Fulfillment of
          Human Freedom
    C. Neutrality and the Political Process
       1. Positive Support for Democratic
          Government
       2. Human Dignity as a Limit to
          Democratic Legitimacy
    D. Neutrality in Adjudication
       1. The Problem of Enforcing
          Unjust Laws
       2. Legal Neutrality and the
          Absence of Partisanship
CONCLUSION

INTRODUCTION

Liberalism is widely regarded as "[t]he dominant strand of American political philosophy," (1) and neutrality is often identified as one of the defining features and virtues of the liberal state. (2) Not surprisingly, then, talk of neutrality deeply informs our public discourse concerning not only the nature of law and the structure of legal institutions, but also the content of particular judicial opinions, legislative acts, administrative rulings, and executive orders.

Frequently, however, what is meant by "neutrality in the law" is far from clear. (3) What quality in law does "neutrality" describe? What does it mean to say that a legal institution or a particular juridical act is "neutral"? Does it refer only to the identity of the decision maker, the nature of the forum, and the procedures employed? Does it refer also to the kinds of argument that will be entertained and advanced in support of the ultimate decision? Finally, does "neutrality in the law" relate to the actual resolution of the dispute, the content of the decision itself?

To put the matter more concretely, suppose that the state criminally prohibits the consumption of a certain hallucinogenic substance. Suppose further that a group of individuals ingest this drug as part of a ritual that is central to their firmly held religious beliefs. (4) Does neutrality demand that the state refrain from banning the substance? If so, does the state violate the principle of neutrality by forbidding the consumption of any particular substance? Could the state, in a neutral fashion, ban the use of the drug for some purposes but not for others? For example, would the state violate the principle of neutrality if it recognized a religious exemption from the general ban (5) or if it permitted consumption of the drug for medical purposes but not for recreational use? (6)

Likewise, consider a state-created social assistance program that provides subsistence benefits to qualified individuals. (7) Would the very existence of such a program violate the principle of neutrality? That is, would the act of drawing a distinction between individuals who are "qualified" and those who are not, with the attendant provision of resources to the former and not to the latter, mean that the state is acting in a non-neutral fashion? If the state later terminates the benefits it once provided by means of a summary administrative decision, has it then violated the principle of neutrality? What if the state official assigned to determine the merits of an application for benefits knew or was somehow related to the applicant? Would neutrality then demand the use of another decision maker or the use of an entirely different method for making the determination?

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

Neutrality in Liberal Legal Theory and Catholic Social Thought
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?