City of Fairfax Obtains Voting Rights Act Bailout: First in the Nation to Win Approval

By Hebert, J. Gerald | Nation's Cities Weekly, November 24, 1997 | Go to article overview
Save to active project

City of Fairfax Obtains Voting Rights Act Bailout: First in the Nation to Win Approval


Hebert, J. Gerald, Nation's Cities Weekly


When the city of Fairfax, Va., decided in 1996 to relocate temporarily the voter registrar's office from the city hall annex to the city hall next door, it was required to do something that most cities wouldn't dream of doing: asking the approval of the federal government. When the city decided to rename one of its polling places in 1985, again the city had to seek approval in advance from Uncle Sam.

Fairfax is not unique in being required to seek federal government approval for making such routine decisions that affect voting. State and local governments in nine states (nearly all of the Deep South, including Texas, as well as Arizona and Alaska) and parts of seven others (much of North Carolina, and parts of California, Florida, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, and South Dakota) face similar requirements. The reason is the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

The Reasons for Preclearance

Back in 1965, Congress had good reason to impose these requirements, known as the preclearance provisions, when it enacted the Voting Rights Act. It found that in the 1950's and early 1960's, case-by-case litigation against voting discrimination had not appreciably achieved any meaningful increase in black voter registration. The case-by-case approach had not worked, Congress found, because some of the states and the local jurisdictions within them, in the face of court injunctions, simply contrived new racially discriminatory voting procedures to replace the ones enjoined by the courts.

To constrain certain states and local governments from trying similar maneuvers in the future, Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act. Among other things, the law suspended all voting procedures and regulations pending scrutiny by federal authorities to determine whether their use would be racially discriminatory. These provisions, contained in Section 5 of the Act,

are known as the preclearance requirements because they require certain state and local governments to get preapproval or "preclearance" of any change that affects voting or elections.

Preclearance can only come from either of two authorities: the United States Department of Justice or a special three-judge court in the District of Columbia.

Preclearance History and Requirements

The states and local governments that have been subjected to the preclearance provisions became "covered jurisdictions" because the Voting Rights Act laid out a formula defining the states and political subdivisions to which the new preclearance remedies would apply. This coverage formula was aimed at areas where voting discrimination had been the most flagrant: any jurisdiction which used any test or device as a prerequisite to registration or voting and also had less than 50% voter turnout in the 1964 Presidential election.

The formula has been revised several times since 1965, but Deep South states such as Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Virginia, and all the political subdivisions in those states, have remained "covered jurisdictions" since 1965. Since the Commonwealth of Virginia has been a covered jurisdiction since 1965, all of its political subdivisions, including the city of Fairfax, have remained covered as well.

In the 1965 Act, Congress said covered jurisdictions that had not in fact engaged in racially discriminatory voting practices could exempt themselves from coverage by initiating a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. To obtain the exemption, known as a "bailout," a plaintiff jurisdiction was required to show that in the five years preceding the filing of the lawsuit, it had not used a test or device "for the purpose or with the effect of denying or abridging the right to vote on account of race or color."

Under the 1965 law, 1) no jurisdiction that had used racially discriminatory voting tests could obtain a bailout; 2) no local government within any state that was entirely covered under Section 5 could seek a bailout, no matter how effectively it was working to remedy voting discrimination and even if it had no minority residents; and 3) states that were entirely covered, like Virginia, could not obtain a bailout if, anywhere in the state, a racially discriminatory voting test or device had been used during the preceding five years.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
Loading One moment ...
Project items
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited article

City of Fairfax Obtains Voting Rights Act Bailout: First in the Nation to Win Approval
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

While we understand printed pages are helpful to our users, this limitation is necessary to help protect our publishers' copyrighted material and prevent its unlawful distribution. We are sorry for any inconvenience.
Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.

Are you sure you want to delete this highlight?