A Public Health Assessment Tool Used to Analyze the Health and Safety Effects of a Major Landfill Landslide

By Ingram, Timothy I.; Hull, Terry et al. | Journal of Environmental Health, September 1997 | Go to article overview

A Public Health Assessment Tool Used to Analyze the Health and Safety Effects of a Major Landfill Landslide


Ingram, Timothy I., Hull, Terry, Black, Michael, Journal of Environmental Health


Introduction

On March 9, 1996, a landslide of unprecedented magnitude occurred at Ohio's largest solid waste landfill. Approximately 20 acres of the existing grandfathered landfill slid into an 11-acre section of recently constructed but unlined landfill [ILLUSTRATION FOR PHOTO OMITTED]. The landslide exposed approximately 1.5 million cubic yards of old garbage. In addition, a 200-foot- high vertical scarp remained where the waste mass had broken away from the landfill.

The Rumpke Sanitary Landfill, located in Colerain Township, Hamilton County, Ohio [ILLUSTRATION FOR FIGURE 1 OMITTED], is licensed to operate by the Hamilton County General Health District and permitted by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA) to accept up to 8,600 tons of solid waste per day. The landfill accepts waste for disposal from 750,000 residential customers in 63 counties and 150 municipalities in three states (Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana) and is also permitted to dispose of waste containing asbestos (1).

Within hours of the slide, the health commissioner and Hamilton County General Health District personnel arrived at the site. It looked as if a miniature Mount St. Helens had erupted. Gaseous vapors were observed emanating from the exposed garbage. The odor - a musty, rotting garbage smell - was strong. The possible release of hazardous substances, exposing people and the environment, concerned health district personnel. Worker safety became a focus of concern. Local media - TV, radio, and newspapers - started covering the Rumpke landslide. Citizens living near the landfill complained of odors and questioned the health effects. Children in nearby schools complained of nausea and headaches. In the eyes of many, the Rumpke Sanitary Landfill had become a public health hazard and nuisance.

The health district staff needed a decision-making tool that would enable them to quickly decide whether to order an evacuation, as well as to determine what kinds of health and safety measures to implement and to understand which residents were most affected by the landslide. The public health assessment process was that tool. The purpose of this article is to explain the process used to assess the severity of the public health hazard and to determine the public health response plan to be implemented.

Public Health Assessment

A public health assessment is a method of organizing and systematically reviewing environmental and health data to establish the presence and magnitude of a public health impact. This tool has a somewhat different focus than do risk assessments and comparative risk assessments. Public health assessments use data from a variety of sources to address community concerns and to determine the public health implications of the hazardous site; they are site-specific and qualitative. Risk assessments usually serve regulatory purposes, such as prioritizing site remediation efforts or establishing appropriate cleanup levels (2). Comparative risk assessments, which are used by communities to set their environmental priorities, involve diverse members of the community (e.g., lay people, scientists, elected officials) in comparing categories of risk.

Between March 11 and March 18, 1996, the Hamilton County General Health District convened an interdisciplinary team of professionals to conduct a public health assessment of the landslide site. The team consisted of the following district staff members: health commissioner; medical director; directors of nursing, water quality and waste management, and environmental health; public health nurses; and sanitarians. The health district consulted professionals from the Hamilton County Department of Environmental Services, the Cincinnati Health Department, OEPA, the Ohio Department of Health (ODH), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention- Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (CDC-ATSDR), and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). …

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Default project is now your active project.
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

A Public Health Assessment Tool Used to Analyze the Health and Safety Effects of a Major Landfill Landslide
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger Reset View mode
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.