Understanding Party Politics in the Former Soviet Union Authoritarianism, Volatility, and Incentive Structures

By Bader, Max | Demokratizatsiya, Spring 2009 | Go to article overview

Understanding Party Politics in the Former Soviet Union Authoritarianism, Volatility, and Incentive Structures


Bader, Max, Demokratizatsiya


Abstract: Party politics in the former Soviet Union is fundamentally different from party politics in Western democracies in many ways. Since 1991, two crucial aspects of party politics in the less-than-democratic former Soviet republics have been the impact of authoritarian practices on party politics and the volatile nature of party politics. Starting with the observation that the creation and operation of parties in the former Soviet Union is driven by elite actors, the author seeks to better understand these two aspects of party politics by studying the incentive structures for elite actors from both within the political regimes and outside the region.

Keywords: authoritarianism, incentive structures, institutions, models of party behavior, political parties

**********

In the semiauthoritarian and authoritarian states of the former Soviet Union (FSU), political party creation and operation are essentially top-down affairs. With rare exceptions, FSU parties, whether they are the ruling power or the opposition, maintain shallow organizational structures, lack credible roots in society, and are operated by elite actors, including ruling regimes and wealthy businessmen. The high degree of electoral volatility that has been characteristic of party politics in most FSU states results not so much from changes in voter demand as from changes in elite actors' support for parties. These actors have tended to regard parties as disposable "projects" that can be abandoned when the parties do not deliver the anticipated benefits. Considering the dominant role of elite actors in the development of party systems in Central and Eastern Europe, some argue that "much more emphasis should be put on understanding the incentive structures of elites that encourage or discourage stability [of party systems]." (1) In this article, I study the incentive structures of political party actors in the semiauthoritarian and authoritarian states of the FSU, a part of the post-Communist world where electoral volatility generally has been greater than in Central and Eastern Europe.

Party politics in the FSU since 1991, compared with party politics in most of Central and Eastern Europe, has a higher degree of volatility and shows the impact of authoritarian practices. These characteristics can in large part be explained by taking the incentive of political party entrepreneurs into account. Volatility in party politics in the FSU is seen as stemming from the fact that elements in institutional design, most notably executive-legislative relations and electoral legislation, provide insufficient incentives for the creation of viable parties, whereas a range of other factors additionally hold back nonregime actors from engaging in party building or affiliating with parties. At the same time, actors within the authoritarian or semiauthoritarian regimes or with ties to the regime often have explicit incentives for creating "undemocratic" parties that distort the electoral playing field.

In the first section of this article, I identify the outcomes, and the scope of these outcomes, of party politics in the FSU since 1991, compared to outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe. In the second section, I look at the phenomenon of "elite ownership" of parties, a factor that greatly reinforces contingency and volatility in party politics in the FSU. In the third section, I discuss the ways the design of political institutions throughout most of the FSU depresses incentives for party building. In the fourth section, I examine the impact of authoritarianism on party politics through a discussion of the party types that dominate party politics in most FSU states. The next section synthesizes the argument about the role of incentives in party politics in the FSU and illustrates that argument by extending Kaare Strom's "three models of party behavior," originally conceived for the political systems of industrial democracies, to the less-than-democratic context of the FSU.

The rest of this article is only available to active members of Questia

Sign up now for a free, 1-day trial and receive full access to:

  • Questia's entire collection
  • Automatic bibliography creation
  • More helpful research tools like notes, citations, and highlights
  • Ad-free environment

Already a member? Log in now.

Notes for this article

Add a new note
If you are trying to select text to create highlights or citations, remember that you must now click or tap on the first word, and then click or tap on the last word.
One moment ...
Project items

Items saved from this article

This article has been saved
Highlights (0)
Some of your highlights are legacy items.

Highlights saved before July 30, 2012 will not be displayed on their respective source pages.

You can easily re-create the highlights by opening the book page or article, selecting the text, and clicking “Highlight.”

Citations (0)
Some of your citations are legacy items.

Any citation created before July 30, 2012 will labeled as a “Cited page.” New citations will be saved as cited passages, pages or articles.

We also added the ability to view new citations from your projects or the book or article where you created them.

Notes (0)
Bookmarks (0)

You have no saved items from this article

Project items include:
  • Saved book/article
  • Highlights
  • Quotes/citations
  • Notes
  • Bookmarks
Notes
Cite this article

Cited article

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

(Einhorn, 1992, p. 25)

(Einhorn 25)

1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited article

Understanding Party Politics in the Former Soviet Union Authoritarianism, Volatility, and Incentive Structures
Settings

Settings

Typeface
Text size Smaller Larger
Search within

Search within this article

Look up

Look up a word

  • Dictionary
  • Thesaurus
Please submit a word or phrase above.
Print this page

Print this page

Why can't I print more than one page at a time?

Full screen

matching results for page

Cited passage

Style
Citations are available only to our active members.
Sign up now to cite pages or passages in MLA, APA and Chicago citation styles.

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn, 1992, p. 25).

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences." (Einhorn 25)

"Portraying himself as an honest, ordinary person helped Lincoln identify with his audiences."1

1. Lois J. Einhorn, Abraham Lincoln, the Orator: Penetrating the Lincoln Legend (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1992), 25, http://www.questia.com/read/27419298.

Cited passage

Welcome to the new Questia Reader

The Questia Reader has been updated to provide you with an even better online reading experience.  It is now 100% Responsive, which means you can read our books and articles on any sized device you wish.  All of your favorite tools like notes, highlights, and citations are still here, but the way you select text has been updated to be easier to use, especially on touchscreen devices.  Here's how:

1. Click or tap the first word you want to select.
2. Click or tap the last word you want to select.

OK, got it!

Thanks for trying Questia!

Please continue trying out our research tools, but please note, full functionality is available only to our active members.

Your work will be lost once you leave this Web page.

For full access in an ad-free environment, sign up now for a FREE, 1-day trial.

Already a member? Log in now.