Give and Take
Rob Anderson's reply to my letter "Sharing the load" (June 11) refers. Thank you. I am guilty of not having knowledge of the Noordhoek Environmental Action Group's (NEAG) expenditure and activities.
The NEAG has spent R200 000 on legal fees and trees. That is great, although I am not sure its emphasis and expenditure are in altogether the right direction.
The R150 000 in legal fees rectified the unlawful activity of establishing the parking lot. Good. The lot has now been legalised and re-established. The village needs the parking. The law has been followed, but R150 000 lost.
Could the NEAG not have foreseen that the parking would ultimately get approval?
Then R50 000 was collected and spent on trees on the common. Good.
My letter dealt with the entire community.
We as privileged citizens have a responsibility to engage and promote all sectors of the community, privileged and unprivileged.
The development of the Dassenberg site was submitted …
Questia, a part of Gale, Cengage Learning. www.questia.com
Publication information: Article title: Give and Take. Contributors: Not available. Newspaper title: Cape Times (South Africa). Publication date: June 17, 2009. Page number: 10. © 2009 Independent News & Media PLC. COPYRIGHT 2009 Gale Group.
This material is protected by copyright and, with the exception of fair use, may not be further copied, distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means.